User talk:Nosophobia
Nosophobia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My account Nosophobia blocked for "being the sock puppet" of a user nicknamed Hadgimarvi. I want to make clear that I have no ties whatsoever with any account by that name . I don't know any person who has an account by that name. No one by that nick uses my internet and I myself do not use anyone's internet other then mine. I do know the person who uses the nickname 'Whatundush'. She is a relative of mine who whenever is at my premises is allowed to have access to the internet via my connection. Several times while at my premises I have seen her browsing the Wikipedia sites. She did talk about "correcting some errors of the articles of her home town." I have never helped her correcting anything and she has never seek my help either. She has never used my computer and I have never used hers. I am not her and she is not me. Last time when visited my premises she told me of being blocked from editing. She told me how a group of editors at Wikipedia wouldn't give any opportunity to the Northern Cypriots to correct or make any additions to some articles regarding Cyprus, which I thought was a bit weird. Since then I have been closely following some Cyprus related articles as well the contributions of the editors who heavily involved in editing those articles. I noticed some activities of those which I thought were not ethical at all. I prepared a report and decided to lodge a complain with the Wikipedia administration. I didn't have a Wikipedia account so before lodging it created one. Apart from lodging my detailed report on the 1st of December 2014 and adding a few more evidences to it on the 2nd of December, I have not actively involved in any other parts of Wikipedia never before. I lodged a report about some editors who were involved in sock puppetry (so I thought I knew what sock puppetry was and and according to my knowledge I also knew that I wasn't one) if I stoop, being a sock, here on this part of the world, internet accounts with a static IP, for "any reason" can be changed within 24 hours just by calling to the IS provider, so I could have done that instead but I would neither act as a sock, nor would change my ip to avoid being blocked. I am not a "sock puppet" and while expecting an investigation about those editors involved in sockpuppetry , and their activities mentioned in my report, I just found out that my report was deleted and I was "blocked for sockpuppetry"... I strongly believe the Wikipedian administrator who blocked me for "sockpuppetry" and deleted my report has made an error. I request my account to be reinvestigated and my report Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TU-nor reopened for investigation. Kind Regards Nosophobia (talk) 09:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm not buying the "she uses my internet every so often" explanation here. only (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nosophobia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all to be able to understand the ties between the family members of Southeastern Europeans, one must be familiar to at least to the cultures of the people of that part of the world. So the conclusion that you reached "she uses my internet every so often" and saying that you are "not buying it" indicates that you fall short of understanding my explanation. Beside that within a period of 5 weeks, she connected to Wikipedia 10 different days only as we can see here and made a total of 13 edits. I can not be sure how many of them are made while she was connected to the internet via my wifi, but even If we assume that she made all of them while at my premises, that is only a total of 10 connections within a period of 5 weeks. I also believe, you are well aware that this person in question connected to Wikipedia only via her mobile device as can be seen here. So I could have said that my wifi was not protected with a password so this person might had connected to my internet while sitting in her car, in the street outside my premises. But that would be a lie. So, instead of you being bias, if you have any evidences/reasons to not to unblocked my account, please do not hesitate explaining them here only any day and time, before or after retiring, but will be appreciated, if you do it before the end of the boxing day. Nosophobia (talk) 07:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
SPI is not something a genuinely new user happens to stumble across. That a brand-new user as their first edit would independently launch an SPI case against users Whatundush had a dispute with would be remarkable. That a brand-new user as their first edit would independently launch an SPI case against users Whatundush had a dispute with while being linked to Whatundush by technical evidence is literally incredible. See WP:MEAT. Huon (talk) 09:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|Decline reason :1) SPI is not something a genuinely new user happens to stumble across.
- I did not stumble across SPI as you thought I did. As I explained above at my "first unlock request" before participating actively in Wikipedia, I did weeks of "homework" where I found out certain users got full control of editing articles by abusing the system. I also researched Wikipedia if anything can be done about those editors and that is what triggered me to open an account.
Decline reason: 2)
That a brand-new user as their first edit would independently launch an SPI case against users Whatundush had a dispute with would be remarkable.
- "One's experience is others inspirations" and as a result I prepared and launched the SPI case in question, independently with my total initiative, which included evidences that any administrator by looking at it can see that my SPI report's more about the inappropriate usage of Wikipedia by certain editors who were abusing the system.
Decline reason: 3)
That a brand-new user as their first edit would independently launch an SPI case against users Whatundush had a dispute with while being linked to Whatundush by technical evidence is literally incredible.
- Those who gained my full trust are welcome to use my wifi while visiting my premises. Whutundush is one of them. I am not denying that she used her mobile to connect to Wikipedia via my wifi... I am also saying that I have never helped her correcting anything and she has never seek my help either. She has never used my computer and I have never used hers.
The SPI case I launched included evidences so any administrator looking at that report can see that it's more about the inappropriate usage of Wikipedia by certain editors who're abusing the system. Nosophobia (talk) 05:49, 11 December 2014 (UTC)}}
Talk page access revoked
[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Your unblock request is just a reiteration of what has already been said. In this context, I have revoked talk page access. PhilKnight (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2014 (UTC)