User talk:Nosecone33

This is the Talk Page of Nosecone

Bah-weep-Graaaaagnah wheep ni ni bong

Nosecone33, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nosecone33! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Reversion on Jupiter Ascending

Hi, Hosecone33. I recently reverted two changes on the page Jupiter Ascending that you had made, and I wanted to provide a little more detail on one of them. When creating a wikilink for words on a page, you don't need to link commonly understood words, such as major countries or religions. For a word like Earth, almost everyone is going to know what that word means, and so it doesn't need to be linked in most articles. That helps reduce the amount of wikilinks, and makes the more helpful ones more likely to be clicked. You can also read more about this here: MOS:OVERLINK. I hope this helps, and take care. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 01:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Hot Wheels World Race.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hot Wheels World Race.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hot Wheels World Race.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hot Wheels World Race.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Hot Wheels World Race.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hot Wheels World Race.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Championisland.png

Thanks for uploading File:Championisland.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Championisland.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Championisland.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

July 2021

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Underworld (film series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Underworld: Rise of the Lycans, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 22:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Your recent editing history at Transformers: Rise of the Beasts shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Regards—ZaperaWiki44^{(✉/Contribs)} 21:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I brought it up on the Talk Page, We'll see how the other users respond. I'll be more careful to keep from frequently reverting the edit so this doesn't escalate to a block. However, I'm pretty sure I'm right this time.Nosecone33 (talk) 19:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Transformers: Rise of the Beasts) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nosecone33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I stopped edit warring. and someone said it's appropriate. This block is a little unnecessary. Nosecone33 (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What is the relationship between this account and User:Computronwanabee? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm sorry for the edit war, thank you for enforcing it to break up my edit war with the other user and blocking him too. I didn't notice my block until I logged in. I'll wait out the rest of my block and avoid any issues that can result in the block being extended.Nosecone33 (talk) 18:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is the relationship between this account and User:Computronwanabee? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at In Time, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:45, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Predacons" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Predacons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 13 § Predacons until a consensus is reached. JIP | Talk 08:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]