User talk:Nosdan

June 2014

Hello, I'm TJRC. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Minehead, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. See in particular WP:ELPOINTS. TJRC (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Argh, my apologies, Nosdan, I read the diff wrong and thought you were adding the EL. Your edit was exactly right and mine exactly wrong. Thanks also to Rodw (talk · contribs) for correcting me and leaving me the note. I must really need this vacation I'm about to take. TJRC (talk) 20:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Talk

Per the WP:Talk guideline, do stop messing with my comments. Things like this, where you are concerned about all the other one-time and barely-there accounts, only help prove my case. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reported at WP:ANI. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flyer22 Reborn stay out of my talk page, my time is far too valuable to have to waste it on paranoid conspiracy theory nutjobs. Nosdan (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for three days for editing others comments such as you did here [1]. Despite the recommendations above that you not. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i didnt realise good faith editing was frowned upon? did you not read the part where i have spent the whole day trying to fight trolling false accusations? and where this was well past a time where i shouldnt have to deal with such accusations and slander? being that you are apparently some form of admin, if you have the authority i would like to be able to "prove" my obvious existence and forgo all these bullshit accusations and finally put this subject of me no existing "to rest"? Nosdan (talk) 12:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We all agree that you exist and I do not think anyone believes you are a bot. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This sort of edit is not encouraging [2] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

edit: of course, i am going to appeal your block, and petition for the removal of your "powers" to troll because of your obvious overuse of them. its not that a block of 3 days is important when i rarely even edit more than once every 3 months, let alone 3 weeks or 3 days..... but as i am sure you understand its the point of the matter. i hope you have as greater day as i have :) goodnight Nosdan (talk) 12:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC) neither is the accusation of "The Nosdan account" as if i am simply an "object" that she can objectifyNosdan (talk) 12:43, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nosdan: as you can check, I have not been involved in any of your edits or admin actions so far. I came here to check the reasons for the uncivil comments on Vote pages. As a third-party Wikipedian, I also ask you to stop behaving that way, if only for the good of the WP project itself. Zezen (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]