User talk:North911

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article The Darkness (comics), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hula Hup (talk) 08:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sexual frustration, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sexual frustration was changed by North911 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869313 on 2011-10-07T22:35:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Misofamilia

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Misofamilia, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magister Scienta ^talk (8 November 2011) 20:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Power Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heat Vision

Ultraman (comics) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heat Vision

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Kryptonian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of superhuman features and abilities in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heat vision (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hi North911,

You might want to check out the manual of style before editing. Your edits leave something to be desired, I'm afraid. Like your edit on The Darkness II was original research, you'll need a source to make that kind of statement. On Vampire: The Masquerade - Redemption you added unnecessary capital letters. I don't want to come off as rude, but this is an encyclopedia after all. Happy editing and good luck, --Soetermans. T / C 09:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Epoch (Top Cow/Heroes and Villains), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ninjutsu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Evanh2008 (talk) (contribs) 21:12, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not capitalize sub-headings. That is against the Wikipedia convention for sub-headings. Please refrain from doing this again. Thank you. Spidey104 14:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Riddick, you may be blocked from editing. Per this [1], please do not capitalize subheadings, as you were warned for above. He iro 18:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dracula (Marvel Comics), Nick Knight (Forever Knight), and Neron, you may be blocked from editing. Per [2], [3], and [4], please do NOT capitalize subheadings, as you have been warned about multiple times already. Spidey104 14:38, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been repeatedly warned about not capitalizing headings. So why would you add one that is improperly capitalized? Please stop! Spidey104 15:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. When you recently edited The Darkness (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wyrm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently infringing Wikipedia's policy on capitalisation. It goes against the grain to block an editor for such a minor offence, but you have been repeatedly informed that this is unacceptable, and have taken no notice, so I am issuing a fairly short block. When the block expires, please try to edit within the framework of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies, and if you think you have good reasons for disagreeing with other editors then please explain why, rather than just ignoring what they say. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Room for improvement

Hey, I'm glad to see that your block seemed to get your attention and improve your editing. Edits like this are extremely nice to see since it shows you understand what you did wrong. However, edits like this are not good. Removing links damages and disrupts articles. You can be blocked again for this type of behavior as that is also considered vandalism. Also, please include edit summaries with all of your edits. We cannot read your mind and it helps other editors understand what you are trying to do. You're doing better, but there is still room for improvement. Spidey104 15:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing a really good job of making good edits now, so thank you for fixing that problem. Can you work on adding edit summaries to your edits? It is helpful to other editors. Thank you. Spidey104 14:00, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, you made some edits to Criticism of Christianity which I have removed. You can re-insert the less contentious fixes again, but note that we can't accept original research on wikipedia, see WP:OR. Contributions should be sourced to reliable sources, see WP:RS. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:27, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Divine command theory

Hi there North911, I see that you've been contributing to divine command theory. I have started a discussion on the talk page about some of what you've been adding; I'd appreciate it if you could have a look and tell me what you think, so that we might come to an agreement. Thanks. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 16:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of religion

Greetings North911, I hope you are doing well. I have been watching your recent edits in the criticism of religion page and I wanted to remind you that the article needs to have reliable information that adequately reflects the sources in what they say (some of your edits involved citations, which I know did not say it in the way you understood it, since I put some of them in myself [5]). I also checked the sources on your recent additions and the original wording before your edits [6] and saw that the sources did not claim what you were assuming. This article is known to have editors "dump" their biases into the sources, but I will not tolerate any controversial interpretations unless those sources explicitly mention them in that way. We must keep a neutral perspective and not slant what the sources say WP:NPOV. We must also avoid synthesis WP:SYN. I have assumed that your edits are in good faith and that is why I have not "reverted" your edits directly like Editor2012 did today, but please make sure your edits follow Wikipedia protocols. It seems you are interested in this article - which is great, but please do not extrapolate what the sources say. Otherwise, other editors will not see your edits as reliable and lose trust in your future edits. Reputation matters here. If you have any concerns, please feel free to discuss in the "Talk" page. Also if you add an explanation on your edits it may help other editors see your rationale for your edits. I wish you the best. Ramos1990 (talk) 04:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

I agree that you should be using edit summaries. I've reverted you again at Deity - we do not use children's books as sources, and if you read the article it's clear that some deities are supreme beings, but most are not - see the rest of the article. Dougweller (talk) 11:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Your recent editing history at Deity shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 20:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Self-hatred, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Age (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Darksiders II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conspiracy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

reverts

I notice that most of your edits are being reverted by a variety of other editors. You may wish to reconsider your activity here as it does follow WP editing requirments. Hmains (talk) 02:31, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

Hello, I'm Hmains. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to religion because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Repeated altering of content to make it look like changes are from references when there is no reason to believe this is true Hmains (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Criticism of Facebook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Superman: Earth One Volume Two

Hi, can you copy edit my plot summary of Superman: Earth One Volume Two? Thanks.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Mental disorder, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Lova Falk talk 18:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --220 of ^Borg 11:56, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moneca Delain

The article Moneca Delain has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ϣere SpielChequers 22:10, 14 October 2013 (UTC) Ϣere SpielChequers 22:10, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bigotry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Race (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dystopia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Self-righteousness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moral superiority (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of WP:Minor edit

Like I stated, edits such as the one you made here and have made elsewhere (looking at your contributions) are not minor edits. Read WP:Minor edit to see what qualifies as a minor edit, and do not mark edits as minor unless they are. Flyer22 (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]