User talk:Norsci

ADHD predominantly inattentive

Thanks for fixing that! ADHD predominantly inattentive Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 09:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Glad I can help. Norsci (talk) 09:38, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salicylaldehyde reaction scheme

Could you explain your basis for declaring Image:Reacción de Rap-Stoermer.png to be horribly wrong? It appears to be both mechanistically reasonable (as described) and in keeping with lots of references and "named reaction" refs. DMacks (talk) 04:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I must admit that on a second (and a third) re-reading I'm not so sure myself. The text makes no mention or reference of the particular reaction, but it does describe the synthesis of (unsubstituted) benzofuran (coumarone) by the reaction of salicaldehyde with chloroacetic acid (See the orgsyn ref). The image depicts salicaldehyde reacting with chloroacetone. It may be that the reaction depicted is real (I'm not going to speculate into that), but it seems unnatural to talk about two reactions in the text and then show an image of a completely different one (which initially lead me to believe it was blatantly wrong, mistaking chloroacetone for chloroacetic acid). Please correct me if I'm the one who's wrong. My opinion is that the image nevertheless seems out of place with the current text. Norsci (talk) 04:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the OrgSyn, chloroacetic acid is used rather than chloroacetone, there would be a carboxyl in place of the methyl according to the image. This then decarboxylates to give the simple coumarone--that's mentioned or hinted-at in the "Merits of preparation" and other commentary in the OrgSyn entry. The image is simply talking about the alkylation and aldol-condensation stages (the named Rap–Stoermer condensation) part of the process, which is general for many different α-haloacyl compounds, not what might come later. You're right, the article wording is confusing, mixing lots of different "reactions or eventual products" ideas together. DMacks (talk) 05:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now things are starting to make more sense, thank you. My initial stance was wrong (I blame a lack of sleep and "trigger-happiness") but it seems that the problem is the lack of connection between text and image. Also, the reference could be better: If I'm following you correctly, the reference for the reaction is hinted at in an anecdote in another paper? It shouldn't be nescessary to dig through the references like you have done (obviously better than me) when there should be a paper somewhere describing the very reaction in the image. Anyways, I concede - but I still hold that the text could be more relevant to the image. Or the other way, one could use an image showing one of the reactions already mentioned. Norsci (talk) 05:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "2,3-dimethylaniline"

A page you created, 2,3-dimethylaniline, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 21:52, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, what? What is the reason for this? Are you at all familiar with nomenclature of organic compounds? Norsci (talk) 22:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Best boy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Umeulogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Umeulogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]