User talk:Norembega
Appearance
August 2023
[edit]You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ponyobons mots 22:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)- You cannot create accounts to circumvent sanctions on your IP range and to continue edit warring. -- Ponyobons mots 22:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- I did not. I made revisions, posted an explanation in the TALK for that page in detail and had my revisions reversed without explanation. Should not the person who reversed my explained changes be blocked for doing so without posting an explanation? Norembega (talk) 22:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- "I did not"--you did. (Admins: this is confirmed.) I'm glad you posted on the talk page--perhaps other editors will be interested in taking up the matter. You've been removing this content since 19 August, and "Removed inaccurate and irrelevant passage", your edit summary at the time, doesn't cut it, esp. not when there appears to be proper secondary sourcing. You didn't post on the talk page until ten days later, and in the meantime started an account to make the same edit, adding unverified and removing verified material without an explanation. If you can promise to edit according to our guidelines and policies, an unblock request might be successful; if you deny what's obvious, it won't. Drmies (talk) 22:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- I did not. I made revisions, posted an explanation in the TALK for that page in detail and had my revisions reversed without explanation. Should not the person who reversed my explained changes be blocked for doing so without posting an explanation? Norembega (talk) 22:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)