User talk:Norbert79

Family Guy

It was removed because 1) it's unsourced and 2) there is already plenty of cultural references in the article. We don't need to list and explain every single gag in the episode. DP76764 (Talk) 20:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Right, what about all the other entries? And yes, why does it hurt when you have more probably more information on the page? Can't understand your point there. Besides, it's quite sad, that you cannot even see the connection between the scene, and the real song. So why unsourced? It's ridiculous.Norbert79 (talk) 20:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

You should familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia IS and IS NOT. Yes, I know what the reference is to, but that doesn't mean it deserves to be included in the article. It's a small piece of trivia that has no significant meaning to the episode. DP76764 (Talk) 20:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Guess you have never listened to the song well then. No worries, there are translations available as well for you. Maybe you should just look up on the song's history and meaning on it's Wikipedia page to understand it's importance in the scene. But I don't mind, I just realized how Wikipedia really works by this small example.Norbert79 (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC) (Ps.: You should also remove all the other cultural references in all the other articles, as they might have no real value neither...)

Hmm, let's see, versions of the song on my iPod? 3. Yeah, I've never heard it. Also, please try to maintain some civility when discussing articles; attacking other editors is not a very good way to argue your case. The other references are reasonable (there should be a couple listed) because they have a source attached to them. There is a method to the madness here. DP76764 (Talk) 20:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)