Jump to content

User talk:Noraskulk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Noraskulk, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! PATH SLOPU 09:43, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Sources

[edit]

Hi Noraskulk, I rolled back some of your edits, and you reverted them back. Many of your edits do not match with their linked sources. In this edit, I didn't find in the source that "Rhos is the self-name of the people of Rus'", but source says that "Rhos is that Greeks used from an early stage for the people of Rus". In this case, we have a Norwegian dictionary, and it doesn't say that any of the words Rossfolk, Rosskar or Rossmann has proto-Germanic roots. I didn't find a quote in the source here. Same happens with Franklin and Shepherd source here and here. This edit is controversial, I didn't find it in the sources, if it's an undeniable fact, we should have a variety of academic sources that confirm this and you can put them here. And so on. Erasing here. Additionally, some of your earlier edits have been reverted by other users for the same reason.

I reverted all these edits back. Please be more accurate and check WP:VERIFY. --AndriiDr (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • As I understand it, you are canceling only my edits for some reason. As for the source, I wrote a year ago that it directly refers to proto-Germanic roots and not a word about the Norwegian language. At the expense of the article Rus' people, I generally go into a stupor and do not understand your actions. Noraskulk (talk) 10:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here you once again return a dubious message about the marginal Professor Leo Klejn, who is not an authoritative historian, and here you remove a direct quote from Andrei Sakharov, by the way, a significant historian. I have checked this source many times, it is beyond doubt. Noraskulk (talk) 10:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

[edit]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Slavicism, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

[edit]

Your recent editing history at Rurik dynasty‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Agricolae (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I like to be right. Noraskulk (talk) 19:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Ymblanter (talk) 14:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe linguistics

[edit]

Please refrain from making edits like this. There is no such thing as "common Germano-Slavic". You appear to be trying to claim that various Germanic loanwords into Slavic come from Slavic into Germanic, and I recently discovered a case of what seems to be the misrepresentation of sources at Slavicism, namely here with a claim (contrary to the source cited) that Finnic and Slavic "share kinship" when they are from completely unrelated language families.--Ermenrich (talk) 14:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary is not a reliable source. Knyaz is a loanword into Proto-Slavic from Germanic, not "common Germano-Slavic". Please familiarize yourself with our sourcing policies at wp:RS.--Ermenrich (talk) 17:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Knyaz, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Ermenrich (talk) 14:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your "moot" sentence on Slavic languages does not make any sense. Please try to at least use language that is comprehensible, and don't just revert things people have removed.--Ermenrich (talk) 14:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ermenrich, "no idea" is not an argument. Noraskulk (talk) 14:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Saying something is not an argument that misses the point of why it was removed is not an argument. Your sentence doesn't make sense as the issue is not moot.--Ermenrich (talk) 14:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't understand what you just wrote, but it's useless to argue with you further. Noraskulk (talk) 14:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You wrote "The issue is moot" as your text. How is the fact that the issue is not moot and the sentence was removed for that reason something you don't understand?--Ermenrich (talk) 14:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Where did I write this? Noraskulk (talk) 14:49, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you didn't write it, why do you keep reinserting it?--Ermenrich (talk) 15:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Where? Be more precise. Noraskulk (talk) 15:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]
If you really don't know [1].--Ermenrich (talk) 15:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, got it. Ermenrich, I did not write that The issue is moot. I just thought your description of editing was strange.Noraskulk (talk) 15:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Interpretatio slavica

[edit]

I have noticed that you are interested in historical Slavic matters, maybe this suggestion could be interesting for you?--Berig (talk) 16:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-)--Berig (talk) 12:48, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Old Norse etymologies

[edit]

Let's not remove the Old Norse forms of the names of Rus' rulers. As you probably know, the mainstream view of Rus' history is that the early rulers were Scandinavians and/or of Scandinavian origin. I know all about Anti-Normanism, as my mother-in-law used to be a professor of history at the Russian Academy of Sciences, and I am really sorry if you find "Normanism" offensive.--Berig (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS, if you are interested in names, I suggest you read this article by Elena Melnikova.--Berig (talk) 17:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Berig, you're a little wrong. "Anti-Normanism" is a false patriotic belief, according to which the first Varangian princes of ancient Russia were Slavs, or the state of the Slavs existed even before the vocation of the Varangians. I don't hold that opinion, and I am very happy to talk about this topic with a knowledgeable person. Noraskulk (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]
The fact is that in the chronicles (especially in the Novgorod First Chronicle) it is not said about the nationality of Oleg. Noraskulk (talk) 12:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]
True, but his name is accepted as Norse Helgi. Anyway, I have no problem with you removing unreferenced information.--Berig (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Where? Noraskulk (talk) 06:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Here. It gave me the wrong impression that you were Anti-Normanist, and I apologize for that.--Berig (talk) 12:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Berig, i forgive you. Noraskulk (talk) 12:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Berig has already address this point with you. Please cease making edits like this where you change Rus' to Russian and remove that Old Norse forms of Rus' names, as you did here [2], [3].--Ermenrich (talk) 14:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

re Russian America

[edit]

What is the deal with this edit in Russian America? See Talk:Russian America#re Russian loanwords from Mayan (!). Maybe I'm missing something? Herostratus (talk) 22:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on Saqaliba

[edit]

Hey, can you please provide the quote you cited here [1] in Russian also? Cheers --MWahaiibii (talk) 23:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Noraskulk (talk) 09:40, 14 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Help.

[edit]

Hello!,

since I'm unbanned now, i would be really glad if you could look into your E-Mail inbox. I would be really, really thankful.

GreetingsKedr26 (talk) 09:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please check it again, further information in the mail. Kedr26 (talk) 17:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noraskulk you dont have to open it on wikipedia, you have to open it in you email programm Kedr26 (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kedr26, I don't have an email. If something is urgent, then here is my yandex mail - anton-iljich@yandex.ru :) Noraskulk (talk) 09:28, 14 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Noraskulk did you get my mail? I sent it on the 14th. Greetings Kedr26 (talk) 15:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kedr26, yes. Noraskulk (talk) 12:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Letopenist

[edit]

Why do you use this word instead of “letopisets”?

I can’t find “Letopenist” or “Летопенист” anywhere else. Did you invent this word yourself? --Brinerat (talk) 11:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks .) Noraskulk (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slavic paganism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chronicles.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

fif. Noraskulk (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Linguistic Barnstar

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
For your contribution to the creation of philological articles (+ for the article Slavicism). -Emenrigen (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Emenrigen, thank you so much! I try to write more often for your sake. Noraskulk (talk) 10:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

br. Noraskulk (talk) 16:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Noraskulk&oldid=1131318185"