User talk:Noosphere/Archive 2

This is an archive of former discussions. Please do not edit it. If you wish to revitalize an old topic, bring it up on the active talk page.

Child of Deaf Adult

I have noticed that you are affiliated with sign language in one way or another. The article on CODAs needs quite a bit of work, and I think is an important article to have as a part of Wikipedia. I would like to invite you to participate in making it a better article. — Esprit15d 20:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll take a look. noosphere 01:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Cabal

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I'd be happy to help out in any way I can with the complaint/case/thing you brought forward. It seems to me that civil discussion is the way to go, but you've suggested that already. :] --Keitei (talk) 01:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thanks for taking on the case. I'm all for discussion. Where shall we begin? -- noosphere 02:09, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship

I think many who would take our side against the menace of censorship do not know about this poll. If you have some time to spare, would you mind posting a short message on their talk page (like mine) to let them know of this poll and invite them to voice their opinions? By involving more people, a larger portion of the Wikipedia community can have their say, for or against the policy. Some places you can go for a list of users are Wikipedia_talk:Censorship#Support, Category:Wikipedians_against_censorship and Category:Wikipedians_opposed_to_censorship_of_the_human_body,. Please check that I've not already posted a message with the heading Wikipedia_talk:Censorship in their talk page to avoid double-postings. If you don't have the time, feel free to ignore this request. Thank you.Loom91 09:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that more people should know about and get involved in Wikipedia politics. However, I believe posting unsolicited advertisements on people's talk pages is spam, and don't condone it. Sorry. -- noosphere 14:18, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martinis work

You're right of course. Rock on. I've had a lovely Martini (vermouth) and thus I must concur. Thanks noo. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 03:26, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DR

I have added his personal attack to the mediation case I have open against him. Ardenn 03:28, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Best of luck to you both in resolving that. However, deleting any but the most extreme and obvious personal attacks is frowned upon on Wikipedia. If you felt that WCityMike made a personal attack against you it's more productive to make a note of it by that comment rather than removing it. Dispute resolution is also a good way to approach things. But deleting comments which aren't clearly extreme personal attacks is liable to be seen as vandalism, as it was this time. -- noosphere 03:41, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, I respond to comments left on my talk page only. Ardenn 03:50, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll open one against you next. Ardenn 03:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Case opened. Ardenn 03:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right to vanish

RIGHT TO VANISH Ardenn 04:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you leaving Wikipedia? That would be a shame. However, please note that that article doesn't mention anything about you having the right to remove other people's comments about your actions on talk pages.

You are, of course, free to "ask that people not refer to you by your name" but " these actions require a degree of co-operation from the user of the project, so Wikimedia cannot make guarantees on this matter".

Finally, that page is not a Wikipedia policy, or even a guideline, so it only has marginal relevance to this dispute, at best. -- noosphere 04:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

Not usre what you mean - I'm not an admin. Are you saying there's a concern about people who put their pictures up? Let me know, I'm happy to help if I can. Thanks noo. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 21:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see. Yeah, thanks! -- User:RyanFreisling @ 21:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agnostic atheism AFD

Posting this comment here as well, since you've missed it once already and it's all got a bit, um, strange overnight. Note that unlike WP:GD, WP:V is very definitely an official Wikipedia policy:

It's not OR, it's unsourced, like thousands of other articles. It certainly isn't unverifiable. Quoting Wikipedia:Deletion: "Problems that may not require deletion: ... Can't verify information in article: Follow the procedure on Wikipedia:Verifiability. If that doesn't work, come back here. If it is truly unverifiable, it may be deleted." WP:V says: "If you want to request a source for an unsourced statement, a good idea is to move it to the talk page. Alternatively, you may tag the sentence by adding the {{fact}} template, or tag the article by adding {{not verified}} or {{unsourced}}.". Personally, I'd list it for (a lot of) cleanup. Vashti 21:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vashti 07:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I did indeed miss your comment earlier. Sorry about that. I've now replied to it on the AfD page. -- noosphere 08:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I awarded you a barnstar and placed it directly onto your user page; I hope you won't find that gauche, especially in view of the deleterious effect it has on the otherwise excellent page design. You should, of course, feel free to move it as you wish. Joe 03:59, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks! That was unexpected. :) -- noosphere 04:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Esperanza

Welcome, Noosphere/Archive 2, to Esperanza, the Wikipedia member association! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member, you might be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is the StressUnit, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Possibles.

I encourage you to take an active voice in the running of Esperanza. We have a small government system, headed by our Administrator general, Celestianpower, and guided by the Advisory Committee, JoanneB, Titoxd and FireFox. The April elections have begun.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact me via email or talk page. Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, please see the IRC Tutorial, which was written by one of our members. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to be!

Thanks! _-M ^o P-_ 04:07, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to welcome you as well. — nath a nrd o tcom ^{(T • C • W)} 11:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitruth

Although I can't agree with the methods you used to come to your conclusion, I do support your overall efforts to keep the article around. By the way, I went ahead and applied the citations needed and stub templates to some of the articles you listed. It's always good to call attention to that sort of thing! Captainktainer 06:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Captainktainer. And I, for my part respect your point regarding "worldcruft", and your zeal to improve Wikipedia by adding templates to those absolutely random articles! :) -- noosphere 06:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]