User talk:NoodleWhacks

Long-focus lens-->Telescopes As Camera Lenses

Hi, I removed this section (diff) you added because it it seems to be mostly advice on astrophotography (please read WP:NOTHOWTO) and bounces around a bit in its description. It is also un-referenced. Also the slow f/ratios non prime focus Schmidts described would be telephoto lenses, not long lenses. Some of this (with reference) could be added to astrophotography.Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 02:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your current revision has citations that are your observations of types instead of citing some other well known author's statements to support the statements in the article. This makes it your own original research. Two of the sources are WP:SPAM as well making them something that will be immediately deleted. It is also still borderline advice or how-to content. Telescopes As Camera Lenses gives s title that is not relevant to the article. The article is about Long-focus lenses. If you can find reliable sources about "Telescopes as long-focus lenses" it could be a good addition. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 03:26, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did a cleanup. Most of the content you added is still there, just adjusted for context, WP:TONE, and WP:MOS. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 12:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a joke, right??? When discussing industrial products, the makers of such products may inherently come under discussion, and can be legitimate subjects. This is particularly the case with esoteric topics, like industrial optical equipment. The Stereo microscope article references Nikon's MicroscopyU- go ahead and delete them immediately.

Also, your copy needed editing. User:NoodleWhacks (talk) 20:45, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

You may be misunderstanding the Wikipedia project. Citations are for citing an already published reliable source, like a book, or paper, or article written by a credible author (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). The Nikon's MicroscopyU cite at least cites several authors. Did I miss the well known author you were citing on this page? Thanks for the copy edit, always needed. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 03:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Uninterruptible power supply, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 17:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Autonomousresearchvess.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]