User talk:Nonenonenonez
Nonenonenonez, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Nonenonenonez! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC) |
February 2017
[edit]
Hello, I'm Dr.K.. I noticed that you made a change to an article, European Union, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dr. K. 04:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Republic of Ireland. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr. K. 05:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced? There is source. But the thing its forecast for 2017y.
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Mumbai does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 5 February
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Iceland page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Economy of Iceland. Jim1138 (talk) 02:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
GDP
[edit]The last IMF report is from 2016. The 2017 data are projections (speculations), which may easily change due to the new U.S. policies. Please stop updating GDPs from 2016 to 2017. Argue your point on WT:Countries if you insist. Materialscientist (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Economy of the Netherlands have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Talk:List of European countries by average wage— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆talk 12:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
February 2017
[edit] This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:List of European countries by average wage, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Being polite, asking nicely -- that will get you far. Calling people "arseholes" will get you blocked. Notice the difference. —MelbourneStar☆talk 12:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 17:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Block
[edit]You've been blocked indefinitely due to disruption. If you wish to be unblocked, please state the reason below. El_C 19:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eimukas22, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.