User talk:Nonemansland

Welcome!

Hello, Nonemansland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 10:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ancestry2010.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ancestry2010.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics of the Ottoman Empire

On your request, I have removed the problematic table. I suggest that you use a sandbox to rebuild that table.

By now, the article Demographics of the Ottoman Empire has 28 links to disambiguation pages (21 different pages). Could you fix that? See this page: Disambiguation pages linked by Demographics of the Ottoman Empire. Good luck. The Banner talk 16:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will fix those disambiguations today. Sincerely--Nonemansland (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You had left one, so I took care of that one. Thank you very much. The Banner talk 18:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note.Nonemansland (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ahmed Dogan page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey ethnolimgusitic map

I am not against to use the Muzurkin map. You can use it on the article. But Izady is not RS. 81.214.89.64 (talk) 20:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? Why do you keep reverting a map without providing a source? Muzurkin's maps of Europe are plain wrong, he's much more unreliable than Izady.--Nonemansland (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Man, as you said, it's based on unoffical estimates. Ok, add back it the page, if you want but at least, such shady map shouldn't be on the top of the article. 81.214.89.64 (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And where did you get the info about Circassians? Given sources do not support it. 81.214.89.64 (talk) 21:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is your suggestion?

You are able to create a map at any time. Since all the data on Turkey is unofficial, keeping two maps of different estimates by reliable publishers in the article(Demographics of Turkey or Languages of Turkey) would be far better than one or none map. Or you can add an existing map by backing with good source? The official authorities of Turkey do not provide statistics, but complete censorship is better to be avoided. This leads to a good idea- can you try creating a more detailed linguistic map based on some early censuses as the 1965 census?

If Izady is not a reliable source then Columbia University(world's top 20) is also not a reliable source. What makes you not trusting that publication? I am sure this is the Kurdish and Zaza areas on his map - the only thing on which he could have been unrelaible and biased. But they are actually derived from the CIA World Factbook[1].

In which area exactly the info about Circassians?--Nonemansland (talk) 22:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's this one.--Nonemansland (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 21:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]