User talk:Non believer evolution

Non believers of evolution do not give in to the tricks that museums do. We shall rise do not believe them!! Especially Charles Darwin! I hate to say this but all the things that scientists say that evolution exists is all a lie!

Attention just because you watch shows such as wolverine and the x men x men evolution doesn't mean that you should believe in evolution. Try this show wolverine and the x men. You will understand. Thank you for giving me some of your attention.

Please listen to me! How can people say that evolution exists without saying that Adam and Eve existed? That is why most christians like me do not believe in evolution. Rise my christian brethren!

You talk like your smart but you misspelled something.

Review your writings before saving! Don't ever ever write here again!

Speedy deletion of Don't ever write at my user page

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Don't ever write at my user page, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Neu_tralle 17:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kiara's biography

A tag has been placed on Kiara's biography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. T-95 (talk) 21:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nicole Winters

A tag has been placed on Nicole Winters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fribbler (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion for James Winters

Ditto the above for James Winters biography. It will really save you some time and effort if you take a look over the notability guidelines. Hadrian89 (talk) 21:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Martin Winters

A tag has been placed on Martin Winters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fribbler (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

You have being blocked for the same reason as previously for creating articles that does not meet WP:N (Notability) guidelines. I'm giving you 72 hours to read the policy on notability guidelines. If you continue to do that again after the block expires, you might be block much longer or perhaps indefinitely. --JForget 21:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone ever writes at my account again! I will edit it!

My edit

Hi. No, I don't remember nominating any of your articles for deletion (though I could be wrong, check the history of the articles), but I did revert your blanking of this talk page. This was itself reverted by another user so I have left no lasting impact on your page! Hadrian89 (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]