User talk:Non-dropframe/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Non-dropframe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 8 |
Thanks
Thanks for fixing my redirect at Factor (language)...was having no end of trouble getting that working, sigh. Endersdouble (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. Your mistake was having a "}" in place of a ")" But I must admit that I had a good laugh at the irony. A tagging mistake in a computer language article. Anyway, happy to help, Non-dropframe (talk) 22:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Hangon gone in 30 sec.
Please explain why my <hangon> tag was deleted within 30 seconds of my protest. I hoped there would be some discussion and I feel that my speedily deleted article on 'Shared reality' was a valid entry. Thanks.
- Hey, I have no power to delete files and only nominated your page for deletion. An administrator agreed with my reasoning and thusly deleted the page. By the way, please sign your talk page posts with Thanks, Non-dropframe (talk) 23:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
So you nominated my Hangon page or my article for deletion? I started a topic - which is valid and I posted credible references. I have worked in this area of research for over 10 years and calling it spam & nn is insulting. My software development supports and validates this research along with my SRED tax credits. Thanks.ShuttleSpace (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
How about a response?ShuttleSpace (talk) 14:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
I am not getting any answers from anyone, this is not professional.ShuttleSpace (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Charles Kennel
You are the vandal. You have erased my work to transform the article, which is now perfectly referenced, into something which is a stub susceptible to be erased. Hektor (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- It hasn't been erased, it's in a previous revision. Check the article history. Further, you may not remove Speedy Deletion templates from articles you have deleted yourself. No amount of editing you do allows you to remove it. If it is up to par by the time an admin reviews it, the template will be removed. --Non-dropframe (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- You have defaced the article so that it is speedy deleted, I hope you are jubilant once it is deleted. Hektor (talk) 23:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- The deletion was in reference to a copy vio in the first place. --Non-dropframe (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- NASA bios are US Government work and PD. Hektor (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Wonderful. Say that on the talk page. I just tag articles. You seriously need to take this less personally. --Non-dropframe (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't need to say it, I have rewritten the article and sourced it. So although University of California copied the NASA bio, since the article has not any more any common word with it there is no issue. Hektor (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- The issue here isn't the valadity of the tag, it's that you removed it; an improper way of going about things. Be patient and let things work the way they're supposed to. --Non-dropframe (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have been patient, and the article has been deleted. The administrator obviously did not care about my hangon or if the article had been edited to make it ok. That is exactly what I feared. Could you be so kind to send a message to explain as the nominator to the administrator that I tried my best and removed any copyright infringement from the article ?Hektor (talk) 08:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- The issue here isn't the valadity of the tag, it's that you removed it; an improper way of going about things. Be patient and let things work the way they're supposed to. --Non-dropframe (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't need to say it, I have rewritten the article and sourced it. So although University of California copied the NASA bio, since the article has not any more any common word with it there is no issue. Hektor (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Wonderful. Say that on the talk page. I just tag articles. You seriously need to take this less personally. --Non-dropframe (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- NASA bios are US Government work and PD. Hektor (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- The deletion was in reference to a copy vio in the first place. --Non-dropframe (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- You have defaced the article so that it is speedy deleted, I hope you are jubilant once it is deleted. Hektor (talk) 23:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to inform you that WP:NOT violations are not speedy criteria. I've removed the recipe but it is still possible for there to be a valid article. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
LOWERN
Just a friendly note about LOWERN. I declined the speedy because there's plenty of context in the article.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Spoken Word
Hi. Are you still working on a spoken version of Macintosh? The talk page template is dated 13 October 2008; it has changed a lot since then. Thought I'd ask. --HereToHelp (talk to me) 20:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have removed the topic: Macintosh from the Spoken Wikipedia document as it has been dormant for for over one year. If you would like to work on this article, please resubmit to:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spoken_Wikipedia.
Thank you--Fumitol (talk) 08:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
meetup!
short notice but: Wikipedia:Meetup/Dallas-Fort_Worth -- phoebe / (talk to me) 23:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions about User:Non-dropframe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 8 |