User talk:Nompere
A tag has been placed on Cricket umpre lever counter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 15:41, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Colin Pearson (1943-)
[edit]I have nominated Colin Pearson (1943-), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Pearson (1943-). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
The article Enterprise Reader has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable position
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 04:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Cricket umpire lever counter for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cricket umpire lever counter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cricket umpire lever counter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Cricket umpire lever counter
[edit]The decision to merge was undertaken via a deletion discussion, which can be found here. If you wish to dispute the outcome, please visit Wikipedia:Deletion review. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 16:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)