User talk:Noian/May2009

This is in Wikipedia user space.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Noian/May2009.

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archives (by month) @ User talk:Noian/Archives

New article

Hi, I have downloaded a number of important Cultural revolution original documents, I think they should be included into zh:wikisource. Please have a look:User:Arilang1234/Sandbox/Ten thousand words letters. As you have more experience in zh:wikisource than I have, I am seeking your advice. Arilang ^talk 17:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't edited at all on zh:wikisource, perhaps your confusing me with someone else? ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 22:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, wrong person. Arilang ^talk 23:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Startaffinity

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Startaffinity, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Postoak (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Biber salçası.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Biber salçası.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 01:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've commented on the image description page:

If you would look at the talk page of the article, you will find that someone mentioned they would take a picture of it last December. Well, it's May, and no one has bothered to upload a "free" one, and I find it unlikely (unreasonable) to assume that a Turkish food would be uploaded on a English wiki (disclaimer: I have no clue on turkish foods, taken off of talk page). I searched the turkish wiki, and I didn't find an exact article name match. I used creative commons search ([1]), and nothing showed up either. The image, as stated, does not violate fair use, and I personally fail to see why wikipedia is so stringent against fair use when there is no free one readily available (WP:RAP, WP:IAR). The image satisfies the other nine requirements, and is encyclopedic. The image is promotional in nature, as it was taken off a site selling it, so it doesn't harm the intended purpose of the image taker. However, I will respect the inevitable deletion, because hypothetically, any wikipedia could take a picture of it, despite the unlikelihood of such an occurrence. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 20:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that WP:NFCC#1 includes the phrase "could be created" is that the presence of a non-free image acts to reduce the likelihood that a free equivalent will be created. We are more likely to get a free photo if the article is clearly missing an illustration. There is even a tag, {{reqphoto}}, which can be placed on an article's talk page to specifically request a photograph. Remember, the goal of Wikipedia is to be an encyclopedia of free content, and non-free images such as this one do not further that goal. —Bkell (talk) 20:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but in doing so, material is removed from the article for an indefinite amount of time that contributes to the article. I believe that it harms more than it helps, however, I respect wikipedia policy, as I said earlier, which is why I did not use the dispute tag. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 20:56, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]