User talk:Nofoolie

Hello Belize!

Please make sure you are registered and not using your IP address as your user name. If you are not registered your IP address is used as your username.. This is a dangerous group. You can find me on reddit!

Notice about sources

All articles must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Take extra care to use high-quality sources. Material about living persons should not be added when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism; see more information on sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebrina16 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The citations that have been added are all from Broadsheets. Previous citations have been accepted by editors. Changes by your account broke citations and added unfounded claims. You are using terms that indicate a conflict-of-interest. Your account also did not undo-changes. Please refrain from vandalising

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Nofoolie (talk) 16:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, you may be blocked from editing.

Repeated attempts to vandalise the page Tony_Quinn_(businessman) has been observed from this account. This includes adding unfounded claims from tabloid newspapers nearly a decade old and adding references irrelevant to the fictitious information added. This page has had numerous attempts to remove information with citations and even whole sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebrina16 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to claim of adding references from Tabloids

Please supply links to those edits where those references were introduced.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nofoolie (talk • contribs) 16:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Enterprise Oil, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 22:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Nofoolie (talk) 22:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello Nofoolie. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nofoolie. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nofoolie|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 19:34, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for picking this up. No, I am unpaid. I was reading through the recommendations made by another editor here: Talk:Tony Quinn (businessman) namely 'He is not a businessperson. He is a guru, and I am changing the heading. Or maybe "life coach"'. That editor did not return and I wondered if best to change now. I was running through recommendations having asked for feedback. I am in no way receiving compensation. I will read through your comment. I have gone through all the updates I have made and undid them. I may have been exuberant at the recommendation of "go for it" on this page Template:Renaming. I will review your feedback. I am happy to discuss. Nofoolie (talk) 19:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection to Quinn? And do not change the lead or the article title again until you get consensus. CUPIDICAE💕 19:43, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood.

I just happen to know a lot about him. It was commented on this podcast https://madnessmadness.buzzsprout.com/1573279/9208281?t=630 made by 2x librarians in Oklahoma that they could not find anything on Quinn from this page. I happen to know a lot, know where the articles are, and thought i could help document it. Nofoolie (talk) 19:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So how is this image your own work? CUPIDICAE💕 19:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is my photo. I have not paid Quinn; I have never received monies from him. It's quite clear that is the case. Nofoolie (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't address a conflict of interest. So you took photos of him but don't know him? CUPIDICAE💕 19:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken photos of many people and don't know them. He's (was) quite the celeb in Ireland

Your original concern was that I was an advocate? Do please see around Jan 2 when this page was put under protective measures as "advocates" were undoing my edits https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tony_Quinn_(businessman)&offset=&limit=500&action=history Nofoolie (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not my question - it's what is your connection, as per our policy that enabled you to have knowledge of all this information and take photographs of the subject? CUPIDICAE💕 19:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection. I have never received monies from Quinn, his associates or "advocates". I know a lot about Quinn. Your original query was that I was an "advocate" which clearly is not that case. It's my photo. I have -no connection-. I've never spoken with him. It's quite clear if you were to read. Nofoolie (talk) 19:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

If you reinstate the inappropriate text to Hamhaugh Island again, or if you persist in giving editors such as Praxidicae vexatious warnings (which I've rescinded and removed from her talk page), I'll block you. Don't do it again. Nick (talk) 08:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to have to begin an arbitration process as this is uncalled for. That Wikipedia user is literally stalking me on Wikipedia Nofoolie (talk) 08:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lighthouse International Group moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lighthouse International Group, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 20:49, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am not connected to this group or others, this is an area of interest to me and I'm privy to information related to these types of groups (regardless of what is claimed above ^^^^), and I am told there will be further articles from reliable-sources

I will read up on the notability-guidelines. Thanks for your work Nofoolie (talk) 20:54, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lighthouse International Group

Hello, Nofoolie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lighthouse International Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lighthouse International Group

Hello, Nofoolie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lighthouse International Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Liz. I am certain this page will reappear at some point, but with different sources which will require a rewrite.

Thank you for your work! Nofoolie (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nithyananda

Page Nithyananda that you edited has an elaborate discussion on the presence of the false blue notice as the topic of discussion. Nithyananda is a religious leader followed by millions. The presence or absence of an Interpol notice and the conflicting views regarding it should be moved into the controversy section rather than be the introduction to the BLP as per the guidelines on BLP:CRIME. Kindly consider moving the lines into the sections below. 189.176.48.2 (talk) 00:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are a group of editors with vested interest in the matter who are constantly trying to denigrate the subject. It would be good if experienced editors can look into the matter and ensure the encyclopedic nature of the page rather than promote the views of every tabloid newspaper in real time or merely repeat the (false) views of agencies. It should be noted that the charges against the subject are all speculations and none have been confirmed by any court of law. On the other hand, courts in the US have exonerated the subject and have fined various parties for frivolous lawsuits and defamation. Interpol's rejection of India's request confirms the standpoint of the subject that the criminal charges are only part of a religious persecution. However, the language used in the page seems to lead readers to believe that the charges are confirmed. The presence of the discussion on these charges right in the introduction to the BLP is one of the means by which vested interests have created this projection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.176.48.2 (talk) 00:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poonam Joshi (Journalist) (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Poonam Joshi (Journalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 20:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Poonam Joshi (Journalist)

Hello, Nofoolie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Poonam Joshi (Journalist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Night in Millstreet (2023 film) has been accepted

One Night in Millstreet (2023 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Poonam Joshi (Journalist)

Hello, Nofoolie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Poonam Joshi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Tailored Films) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring in violation of WP:BLPRESTORE and WP:ONUS. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Behavior at User talk:Wrtyzxylu13

Hello Nofoolie, your messages at User talk:Wrtyzxylu13 have been unhelpful and excessive. There is no need to throw three unsigned warning templates for vandalism onto the talk page of someone disagreeing with you about the inclusion of content in a biography. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nofoolie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did try to engage in discussion with the now-banned contributor on their talk page and the subject Tailored Films talk page. I issued soft warnings raising severity when ignored. Attempts to resolve were ignored. Nofoolie (talk) 19:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; your block has ended. Good luck with editing in the future. asilvering (talk) 01:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You did not engage with the user in any helpful way, and even a lack of responses to helpful messages wouldn't have justified repeated restoration of the disputed content. My main concern is whether a partial block might fail to prevent further disruption if you continue this approach towards other users, looking at Special:Diff/1161341686 which appears to be a past warning for similar behavior from Drmies. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, User:ToBeFree, I recall the case. Nofoolie, please don't claim that those were proper efforts to resolve a conflict in good faith. Drmies (talk) 21:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have this document now Wikipedia:Responding to a failure to discuss. This is actually helpful. Nofoolie (talk) 21:28, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]