User talk:Nocturnalsleeper

Welcome!

Hello, Nocturnalsleeper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TABOO

Hi. Interested in your thoughts on this. Peter Damian (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolò Giraud

HI thanks for your message. I'm just back from net/computer-free holiday, and doing the usual tidying up and admin at home. I'll take a look at this, but a difficult one as I have no expert knowledge of this area. Peter Damian (talk) 08:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pederasty

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederasty&action=history Lihaas (talk) 20:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Threat above

Don't worry too much about that but there is a risk as they have gone to User:FT2. I am looking at your contributions - can't see any problem. I know Oxfordian theory is pretty much crank territory, is there a name for the idiosyncratic school of William Percy? This is where it all seems to be coming from. Will be back later. Peter Damian (talk) 18:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article links

Hello... regarding your post on the Byron page about John Murray, I don't have the info on the content, but you mentioned wanting to know what articles link to that one. You can find out pages link to any particular page by using the "what links here" link, in the toolbox in the left-hand column of any page. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 00:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that

It looks as though you have been blocked after all - FT2 did not leave a message. I will do whatever I can (assuming I am not blocked, which is quite likely). Regards Peter Damian (talk) 17:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pederastic relationships in classical antiquity

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Pederastic relationships in classical antiquity. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pederastic relationships in classical antiquity. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pederasty in ancient Greece

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Pederasty in ancient Greece. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pederasty in ancient Greece. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]