User talk:NobleFrog

NobleFrog, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi NobleFrog!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

In case you didn't know, spaces are normally used with punctuation marks.

Instead of this:

I like bunnies(rabbits).They are not only cute,but friendly too.

Try this:

I like bunnies (rabbits). They are not only cute, but friendly too.

Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anna Frodesiak: Thank you! I hope I'll be more careful in the future.

Hello, NobleFrog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Introduction 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help Tips	How to write a great article Manual of Style Be Bold Assume Good faith *Get adopted*
If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC. You can also place `{{Help me}}` on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is everything I need. Thank you again and have a nice day!NobleFrog (talk) 09:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hi NobleFrog.
Just wanted to let you know that the User:DenisGusinje has been reported to the Arbitration Board for his latest disruptive editing in the articles Battle of Novšiće, Ali Pasha of Gusinje, and Rexho Mulliqi.

The link is: [1].

Thanks and regards.Mondiad (talk) 21:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We are going to see if that user will continue edit warring or will reflect on his past mistakes. As for Battle of Novšiće I hope everything will be solved fairly as soon as possible.NobleFrog (talk) 09:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vasil Zlatarski vs. Strashimir Dimitrov

You separated the two Bulgarian historians with the comment "you can't judge the historians". Zlatarski was indeed a prominent academic scholar.

John Van Antwerp Fine (1991). The Early Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Sixth to the Late Twelfth Century. University of Michigan Press. pp. 26–. ISBN 0-472-08149-7. Some scholars, such as the prominent Bulgarian historian V. Zlatarski,
Manufacturing Middle Ages: Entangled History of Medievalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe. BRILL. 22 August 2013. pp. 362–. ISBN 978-90-04-24487-0. prominent academic scholars, such as historian vasil Zlatarski (1866–1935)
Archivum Ottomanicum. Mouton. 1993. ... the best Bulgarian scholars, such as Zlatarski

So, if the same cannot be said about Dimitrov, Zlatarski's words weigh more.--Zoupan 21:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are trying to make Voisava Tripalda look like Serb. You can't judge historians so separate them by yourself.NobleFrog (talk) 08:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC) Strašimir Dimitrov was a Bulgarian historian and corresponding member of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.NobleFrog (talk) 08:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 24 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the State of Palestine page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erongo Region, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arandis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 21:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NobleFrog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is interesting to call me a sock of a problematic user. Instead of helping newcomers you bite them as much as possible. Articles like Vrana Konti, Voisava Tripalda, Ali Pasha, Raoul Bova are sensitive and there are many editors (who are interested in Albanian articles) who want to edit them. The space after comma problem belongs to my early days here but it seems the clerk didn't realised that. If the clerk believes I closely follow user:Zoupan then it's strange how they have such a position in Wikipedia. It is clear the problem is that Ronaldi+ and someone insisted on finding a way how to kick him out.NobleFrog (talk) 21:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even without CheckUser evidence, the amount of behavioural evidence is enough to make it absurd to suggest that we are dealing with two independent editors; add to that the CheckUser evidence, and it is way beyond any reasonable doubt. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of The origin of the Snow White tale

The article The origin of the Snow White tale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Already a page on subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 19:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]