User talk:Noahfan123

Noahfan123, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Noahfan123!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trigger (Professional Wrestling Stable)‎

The article Trigger (Professional Wrestling Stable)‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 20:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trigger (professional wrestling) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trigger (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trigger (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 21:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hiroki Murase for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hiroki Murase is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiroki Murase until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 11:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hiroki Murase, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minoru Tanaka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puroresu

I appreciate you create puroresu articles. However, you can't include every match the wrestlers had. Please, list only the notable ones.--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Koji Doi (professional wrestler)

A tag has been placed on Koji Doi (professional wrestler) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 16:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles

Your articles are not well organized like you claim they are. They're quite the opposite. They're long walls of unimportant results with no inline citations. If I'm blunt, your English and punctuation are so bad that every single one of your articles needs a serious rewrite to be worth anything. Also, the sock puppetry is a continuing issue. You were supposed to go back to User:Martimc123 and appeal the block there. Otherwise you risk getting these new accounts blocked as you create them. Also, stop uploading copyright violations to Commons. How many times do your images have to be deleted before you get this? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 16:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noahfan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im sorry i will not upload fotos again and was creating articles and i dont remember the passoword of the user Martimc123 and i will organize better my articles

Decline reason:

The standard offer applies. If for 6 months you're able to avoid creating new accounts, avoid editing the area in question, and avoid disrupting the site otherwise, we can unblock you easily. --slakr^\ talk / 04:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Noahfan123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daemon-gun

The article Daemon-gun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This may not be appropriate for an encyclopedia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dawnseeker2000 15:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]