User talk:Noah044

Welcome!

Hello, Noah044, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
How to edit a page and write a great article
The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
The handy Manual of Style
And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango 123 03:14, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page. :)

Argentine Notice Board

You are kindly invited to join the Argentine Notice Board. Mxcatania 18:16, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:T056dh01.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:T056dh01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Adam Clark ^(User_Talk) ^(email) 04:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Field hockey

I've reverted a POV edit at the above article. Please do not add your point of view. If this is widely-accepted, then sources should be provided. Thanks, Ian Cairns 01:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'v provided the link for the information but you have deleted it again. Please put it back, here it is:

Every matchs has one referee. It can be either male or female. Currently, the best female referee in the world is an argentine woman called Soledad Iparraguirre [1].

Thanks and sorry for the missunderstood.

Hello Noah

Thanks for your comment. In English, a Field hockey referee is called an Umpire - as you can read from the article. As far as I can tell from your Spanish-language blog article, your source seems to be about 3 years old and came from a South American website, which may have been biased. Do you have a current FIH or similar world-class source that gives a statement (preferably in English, but a foreign language source with a suitable warning would be acceptable) that this lady is currently the best field hockey umpire in the world? This would probably be undisputed. Until then it would be best to leave your comment out of the article. Thanks, Ian Cairns 01:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS- It's two umpires according to the article.

PPS - I've checked [2] and there is no reference to Soledad. So, she is not a very experienced international ladies umpire. Ian Cairns 01:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:F022ch01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:F022ch01.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

Image Tagging Image:Chivimaxim33qn.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chivimaxim33qn.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Link spam

This message is regarding the page Nicole Kidman. Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. Note that Wikipedia may see print or DVD publication, so we want more content, not more web links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Yamla 16:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:FullarticleLizHurley.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:FullarticleLizHurley.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:50, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Flag of Argentina

Hello! Are you Argentine? If you are, then our Wikipedian community is here to help you! The WikiProject Argentina is currently recruiting new members, and we will be really pleased if you join! Don't forget to sign your membership with four tildes (~~~~). Goodbye! —Aucun effort n'est trop grand 08:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont put nonsense on your websites...

We Argentines live in Latin America,but we are not Latinos ok! We connect ourselves much more with Europeans. Thanks (71.232.231.174 13:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Nicole Kidman

Not sure what this [3] edit to the article was meant to be? I reverted it. --Steve 03:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I updated the wrong section, and I din't know how to revert it, I'm really sorry. thanks for changing my mess.

No problems. To revert, all you have to do is edit a previous version in the 'history' before you made the change. It will warn you that you are editing an 'old' version. Then just save, with an edit summary to say you are reverting your own change. --Steve 01:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! ^^

Image:Picsony2006-15.jpg

Please write a detailed fair use rationale for this image, including its source information. Cbrown1023 00:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Pekerman.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Pekerman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. talk to Ytny 03:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ghost_Whisperer_Cast.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ghost_Whisperer_Cast.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 23:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Conanx2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Conanx2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 10:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sabrina & The Fates.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sabrina & The Fates.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr/talk 16:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maximtapaluna2pd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Maximtapaluna2pd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AndyXsabrina.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AndyXsabrina.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 07:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Picsony2006-15.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Picsony2006-15.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]