User talk:No problem 1254
Dear Iraqi Dinar vandal
[edit]Dude, your strategy isn't working -- time to try a new strategy (like maybe actually DISCUSSING the contents of the Rafida article with other people, instead of trying to unilaterally impose your bizarre garbled version with names randomly swapped around). AnonMoos 16:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Rafida. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
User notice: temporary 3RR block
[edit]Regarding reversions[1] made on February 1 2007 to Rafida
[edit]i dont understand how al the edits to this topic are done by the same person AnonMoos
[edit]i dont understand how al the edits to this topic are done by the same person AnonMoos. Is he some volunteer who forces control over the whole Wikipedia. Who stops him from doing this. It says here he is some clergy priest. I find that offensive for him to be such a know it all in this encyclopedia and a man to express judgement as he does in so many posts. I dont think he has the proper discernment of people, any person, or even knowledge of many of these topics. So what stops him, who'll stop him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elijah Michael (talk • contribs) 19:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC).
- Whatever, dude -- I was editing the Rafida article before the "Iraqi dinar" vandal ever came along, and I intend to keep him from turning it into gibberish (with the help of others, of course...). AnonMoos 20:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)