User talk:NoToFakeEdit

Kos nanat nima moradi, moragheb khodet bash nane kir dozd to shiraz dadam nanat began — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.133.194.196 (talk) 09:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

کص ننت ننه جنده نیما مرادی دادم شیراز بگانت — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.133.194.196 (talk) 09:25, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sabotage warning

Kos nanat nima moradi, moragheb khodet bash nane kir dozd to shiraz dadam nanat began

Recently, you have manipulated articles for no reason, this is vandalism in Wikipedia, this will close your account and the rest of your storage accounts. Medellin fa (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello NoToFakeEdit and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Zsinj^Talk 23:38, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 23:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jawid Safi, you may be blocked from editing. Please use the article’s Talk page to discuss major changes to articles that are impactful and being reverted. Zsinj^Talk 23:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Zsinj. Airtransat236 (talk | contribs) 00:00, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

== Hijacked Article ==

this user Medellin fa make wiki for himself on anothers person name! (with photoshop photos + please chek the photos), Jawid Safi And Javad Safaee Is 2 Different Person! The Fake Person Javad Safaee Try To Make A Wikipedia For Himself With Another Name, The Photo Of Article Is Photoshop And Fake >> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jawid_Safi AND https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehrab_Hossain_(Mehrab_Naabi)

Javad Safaee Is A Fake Musician With Fake Sources BUT Jawid Safi Is A Real cricketer, Javad Safaee Try To Make Many Wikis In Another Wikis But Cant: https://ss.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javad_Safaee

And now he try to make a wiki for himself under another person name, just chek the photoshoped photos...

Their team also try to make wiki for another persons too, Please chek the history of this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehrab_Hossain_(Mehrab_Naabi)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jawid_Safi NoToFakeEdit

That Article Is Hijacked By Javad Safaee, The Jawid Safi and javad Safaee Is 2 Different Persons, If you search in youtube you see Medellin (this user) and Javad Safaee Is SAME, This fake person try to make a wiki for himself under another bodies name! NoToFakeEdit (talk) 00:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your recent editing history at Jawid Safi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 00:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Please don't edit war, even when you are right

Hi NoToFakeEdit, thank you for noticing and trying to fix articles that had been hijacked for marketing purposes. For the future, though, please try to keep calm and do not edit war even in a case like this. I understand that it is easy to get frustrated, but remember that the encyclopedia is not permanently harmed if it takes a few extra hours to restore the correct version. There are cases where it is important to get harmful content erased immediately, but this is not one of those. Take a moment to read this guideline. As you saw above, you can get blocked from editing if you keep edit warring, even if you are right!

It can also be counter productive to be too upset when posting messages to user talk pages, or to admin boards like WP:ANI. It is not a real-time help chat, and if you post half a dozen messages in 40 minutes, in an upset tone with lots of exclamation marks, it can unfortunately make other editors take you less seriously. Allow people a bit of time to react, and remember that editors are volunteers who live all over the world – I was asleep when you posted to my user talk page, for instance. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:47, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]