User talk:NoMorePolitics

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Frank Lasee. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article must include proper sources. Thank you. Arthurrh (talk) 18:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Lasee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Arthurrh 17:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Lasee, you will be blocked from editing. Please don't intentionally add invalid categories to a user to push a particular POV Arthurrh 19:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Sockpuppetry, sock of banned user.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. SQL ^{Query me!} 19:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoMorePolitics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know what the heck 'sockpuppetry' is, but I didn't do it.

Decline reason:

WP:SOCK, and you clearly did. — Yamla 20:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoMorePolitics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

is there any proof here, or is this 'hearing' based entirely on speculation, conjecture and voodoo?

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed. Please don't lie to us. —-Deskana (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.