User talk:NoHopeGroup

The article No hope has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 19:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Not availible.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Not availible.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as No Hope, to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 21:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with No Hope. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 23:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to No Hope:

Your recent edit to No Hope (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 23:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with No Hope. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Finngall ^talk 23:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as No Hope, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 00:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated recreation of No Hope. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 20:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]