User talk:Nnoob

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Nnoob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

195.229.242.88 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Sockpuppet

Blocking administrator: Raul654 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —P ilotguy (ptt) 22:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

g

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nnoob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

oh sorry my isp has a filtering proxy shared ip it wasnt me that did tthis i hate my isp!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Decline reason:

No reason given for unblock on account of violation of WP:SOCK. Blocking admin, please feel free to override. -- Yamla 16:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stand by; the blocking admin's comment has been requested. Sandstein 21:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]