User talk:Nmvarco

Hello! This is my talk page.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nmvarco (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My friend emailed me a Wikipedia account and told me to log in because he had done something funny. I had told him that I created one a few days ago. I logged in and saw that he had been vandalizing different pages. (You will notice the IP I used to log into this account is different then the one he used to log into Mop kilk. Then, I logged back out and tried to make edits on this page, but saw that I couldn't. This is why I am requesting to be unblocked. Nmvarco (talk) 14:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you posted to my talk page, there was no block affecting you- but upon looking at this more I am blocking this account as a sock or meat puppet. 331dot (talk) 16:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In order to help you, you will need to give the IP address involved. If you don't wish to do this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to request unblock. Also, your friend should not be allowing you access to their account. 331dot (talk) 14:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 16:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nmvarco (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This isn't a sock puppet. I actually want to make edits and I did a few days ago. Nmvarco (talk) 17:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:02, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nmvarco (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have told you everything. I can't prove anything more. All I can tell you is to just trust me and I won't do it again.Nmvarco (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

At the very least you'd have to explain why your conduct was inappropriate and what you'd do differently if such a situation arose again. Huon (talk) 12:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nmvarco (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wouldn't log in to someone else's account I guess especially if it was being used for vandalism.Nmvarco (talk) 12:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is nowhere near sufficient. You already knew you shouldn't do that. You also have directly avoided answering Huon's questions. Yamla (talk) 13:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nmvarco (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Then what do I do to get unblocked?Nmvarco (talk) 13:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 10:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Don't use the {{unblock}} template if you're not requesting a review of your block. Abuse of that template may see your talk page access revoked. That said, while I can see that you tried to address my questions, I don't think the answer shows a sufficient level of understanding to lift the block. Beyond that bare minimum, it would probably also help if you could outline what edits you want to make if unblocked - what you did so far needed to be reverted. Huon (talk) 15:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do we know that you are not your friend who vandalized? 331dot (talk) 15:28, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because the IP I use this account with is different than the IP that my friend used for Mop kilk. The IP that Mop kilk actually edited it on was his. I just logged on. Nmvarco (talk) 16:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, the IP address was the same. --Yamla (talk) 10:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]