User talk:Nmunson

Nmunson, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nmunson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Your edit to Irma Becerra Fernandez has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Marymount University‎?

Do you have a connection to Marymount University‎? ElKevbo (talk) 16:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nmunson. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nmunson. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nmunson|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ElKevbo (talk) 22:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That message is already on my user page... "Nmunson, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Marymount University for their contributions to Wikipedia." Nmunson (talk) 17:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We appreciate your disclosure. But that disclosure does not exempt you from our conflict of interest policies and practices. Please don't make substantive edits to your employer's article(s). You should place requests and suggestions in the article's Talk page. ElKevbo (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are suggestions placed in the Talk page reviewed consistently? Nmunson (talk) 19:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not. I don't know but I would guess that few editors have that article on their watchlist. If you post a request or suggestion there and it doesn't get a timely response, feel to drop a line at WT:UNI; that is monitored by several editors with a specific interest in articles about higher education. And you're welcome to drop me a line on my User Talk page, too. ElKevbo (talk) 04:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Marquardtika (talk) 15:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hi Nmunson! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, thank you. Nmunson (talk) 16:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]