User talk:Nku pyrodragon

Hi styrofoam

{{helpme}} Hi i have a question, why is it that when a person gets a final warnning and they continue to harass they get another final warning? shouldn't it be final warnning then banned? because the user:styrofoam1994 has received multiple last warnnings yet he continues to harass me.

Please do not use the {{helpme}} template to prove a POINT. The user has been adequately warned and is being dealt with. I would encourage you to spend less time focusing on what is obviously overblown hostility towards you and more time focusing on analyzing why you were blocked and what you may do to improve that situation. Best regards. --omtay 38 19:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Styrofoam1994 will not stop harassing me and inundating me with atrocious rumors that I am a sock puppet. He even wrote that I am sleeping with 2 women right now which is also, as you can probably guess, ALSO false. Such continuation of false rumors has enraged me and has been hurtful.

{{helpme}}I am being accused of a sock puppet and i completely disagree with that accusation. I sincerely believe that the user Styrofoam1994 has been accusing me falsly. However, i do understand that my annoyance to a wikipedia admin might be considered trolling or a harassment. I will take the punishment for that but i am being serious, I assure you that i am not a sock pupppet. Also, may i please have an admin that can communicate with me one on one and can somone pleasae make it so that styrofoam1994 can not keep on harassing me on this page? he was clearly warnned for harassment for attacking me earlier and i sincerely believe that it is in the best intrests for the admins to keep us seperated

????--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 23:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per your request, I have made a post to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. One (or several) administrators will review your situation. Please do not re-add the {{helpme}} tag regarding this situation. Thank you. --omtay 38 03:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Omtay, I really appreciate it--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 03:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nku pyrodragon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I being accused of all of these things!?!? can an admin come here and tell me please?

Decline reason:

It is clear from your contributions that you have been harassing numerous editors using an IP, and created an account toi continue that here. I see no reason to unblock this account given its unconstructive use so far. — Ryan Postlethwaite 01:32, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nku pyrodragon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I being accused of all of these things!?!? can an admin come here and tell me please?

Decline reason:

From what I can see, you're a fairly obvious sockpuppet. Besides, you've been harassing people. — Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 00:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comments

But where is the evidence??? iam really not a sock puppet and how have i been harassing people? really other people have been harassing me like styrofoam1994 who called me a dick head. Is that not a harassment? and truly if i ment to hurt anyone's feelings i didn't mean it but i doubt i did helpme

OMG i already said that iam not a sock puppet now iam aware that people accuse me of harassing but can i please get a warning instead of a harsh block indef?

From your tone of writing on the above lines, it is clearly visible that you were also behind Umm killer, rws killer2, and rws killer, all of whom got banned indefinitely. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 02:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC) STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 02:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC) STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 02:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Styrofoam1994, Please leave me alone how many times must i beg of you to stop harassing me and accusing me. Let the admins handle this and i am not your friend. How can you possibly connect me with somone else in this site? Please, all that I am asking for is for you to really thinkabout it and reconsider the likely chance that I'm your friend.

Concerning "friends"

So... Your previous comment was contradictory, saying that you are not a friend of mine, but then later you say "please reconsider the likely chance that I'm your friend." I suggest that you reconsider regretting being and making sockpuppets. OK? And please improve your atrocious grammar and spelling. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 03:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, I am sorry for being uncivilized right now, but I am extremely sure that you are Brandon, since you are intertwined with User:Sanjay517, and he is a very new member that only his friends would know. Also, if you weren't in middle school right now, you wouldn't be writing about the honors, and if you weren't Brandon, you would not have paid attention to the post I made about somebody named "Brandon" who keeps "friggin whining about not passing into the honors". STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 03:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning "friends"

Since you are accusing me of being your friend and you are absolutely sure that I am, I am asking you to reconsider the possible chance that I could be your friened in this website of millions. What I am truly trying to say is that there are millions of people who go onto wikipedia and edit. What is the chance that I am your friend "Brandon"?--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 03:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erm. Probably certainly even though it goes against the laws of probability? STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 03:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OMG GOD HELP ME HOW MANY TIMES MUST I SAY I AM NOT I REPEAT NOT YOUR FRIEND. I SAID THAT FOR 30 TIMES NOW PLEASE, I BEG OF YOU, PLEASE STOP ANNOYING ME AND LEAVE ME ALONE!!--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 03:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See, I told you so.

You display all the personality traits of the real Brandon:

You keep trying to look super-formal in your writing.
You have a hotheaded personality and fiercely deny things, while the average Wikipedian editor I know is calm.
You have atrocious grammar and spelling mistakes.
Your writing is poor. (guess where I compare this from)

You write like him. (see above)
He posted messages on this board at approximately the same time you called me on the phone.
Your laughter on the phone of disbelief about me believing that you are Brandon was very false-sounding.
Your voice was also not sincere enough to sound true.
If you really are not Brandon, then Brandon would not have expressed much concern in this thing via the phone.
We have the undeniable, super-special, super-covert Checkuser evidence and I know the IP addresses that you use. You got busted with that when you were using User:Umm killer.
If you aren't Brandon, you would not express concern about this user or anger about it on the following Monday, 28 January 2008.
Brandon, via the telephone call, responded very swiftly to me and expressed disbelief that I thought this ID was Brandon's. However, he did not sound true. (see above)
There's more evidence I will add later. Have a nice sleep and let's continue tomorrow.

STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 03:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

False

Why are you doing this to me? I am not your friend how many times must i repeat my self? Seriously, CAN AN ADMIN PLEASE BLOCK STYROFOAM? Do you have no decensy in you? you said,"There's more evidence I will add later. Have a nice sleep." How rude and cruel can you get after listing such a false report. I am sure that the admins will surely come through this and realize how unjust this is. Styrofoam I am warning you. Stop Harassing ME! If you persist in such actions then i will ask for an admin. Now please stop it. How much emphasis must i put into it?

You've already put enough emphasis, but have you noticed that so many admins are already into this case and they're not helping you get unblocked? Also, "Have a nice sleep" was supposed to be polite, saying "good night" because it was near midnight then. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 15:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After listing all those hurtful reasons and everything you then tell me to have a good night rest? any person can read that and know what you really mean. when you said, "have a nice sleep" you were clearly trying to make the situation worse

At least I was not acting hotheaded and instead was calm, unlike you. You must act more dignified. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 16:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me?

Look At this[1] You think that i am a prostitute? how can you treat a human being like that? Leave me alone!

That was a joke. Now that's one more piece of evidence that you're Brandon: You never can laugh about friendly jokes.

Is calling the president of the United States Of America a prostitute a joke? NO! Mr. Bush can be impeached if he sells his body to people. Styrofoam1994 When will you understand what LEAVE ME ALONE means?--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 04:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

STOP HARASSING ME STYROFOAM1994 PLEASE

Dude, stop harassing me. Now your accusing me of not writing like the accused users and trying to conceal my identity? STOP IT PLEASE YOU ARE HINDERING MY PEACEFUL AND TRANQUIL WIKIPEDIA EXPERIANCE!

Please give me proof now.

If you still furiously deny being Brandon, please give me proof that you are not. Also, you used to vandalize my Wikipedia game. diff involving you. You did not follow the rules even if I stated them very clearly. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 04:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alqaeda's collaboration with rogue nations can lead to Biological Nuclear Terrorism--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 04:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the rules. It says

You must add a relevant Wikipedia link.

It's so simple even a caveman can do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Styrofoam1994 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I remeber seeing other people not putting relevant wikipedia links and not even linking at all

Then why didn't you learn from them? stupid pyrodragon. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 16:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great, You are now calling me stupid is that so? I seriously see no reason for you to continue harassing me and I read your talk page and you apparently promised not to attack me again. Guess you ignored the wishes of other editors and continued to harass me sigh -_- --Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 16:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And look here

If you truly aren't Brandon, you would not know about the potential danger of me propagating that article about Ms. Menna and all the various other rumors that I know about you, which I could spread to Gokhul, Kaustav, etc. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 04:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, are you trying to threaten me? by spreading rumors?--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 04:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admins Will Know

The Admins will know that you are revising what you wrote earlier in order to cover up your rude behaviors or to make it seem less hurtful.--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 04:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You got 1 more chance to say sorry before I spread the articles.

There's your hamburger and cola and fries, and have a nice day. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 04:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Geez, cool off kayi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Styrofoam1994 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Wikipedia:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. Let's read it and end this useless argument. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 16:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank GOD!, I have been waiting for this moment for forever! You have finally come to realize that harassing me for the past 24 hours has proven worthless and has resulted in a backlash.--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, I just emailed all the articles. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 16:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What articles--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 16:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wait and see -- heh heh. STYROFOAM☭1994_TALK 16:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never wrote an article that was offensive or anything else that could hurt me or anyone else in any way without giving evidence. Plus you don't know my name so it will not hurt me in any way if you try to arouse a rumor.--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 16:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brandon.

PS: I didn't send the articles so don't worry. I'm saving them for a future crisis. STYROFOAM☭1994^TALK 02:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HOW MANY TIMES MUST I SAY IT!!! I AM BRANDON!!!!

WHY DO KEEP DOING THIS!!! ARGH!--Nku_pyrodragon (talk) 18:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Durzatwink for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. _contribs STYROFOAM☭1994^TALK 02:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]