User talk:Njan

Archives: March 2008

Kirkcaldy Pictures

I just wanted to let you know, if it was you who took the original picture of St Brycedale Avenue for the further education sub-section. If so, i decided to remove it, when i was adding my 30+ submitted photos on the page, since the photo didn't show the actual building. No hard feelings, if it was.

Still i really like those three other pictures you submitted on the page particularly the Volunteer's Green one. I was influenced by this when i submitted my first one of the Kirkcaldy Civic Society plaque of the old town house and clock site 1827-1935. So thank you and if there is anything i can do for you, then i would be very grateful or vice versa. Kilnburn (talk) 20:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

right, that's fine. well i'm not going to add another picture for the article, because it has enough on it's plate and most of Kirkcaldy's landmarks have been noted-streets, buildings, churchs and education campuses. that was my intention, it was just to give the article a huge boost and a bit of credibility that was truly lacking (in spite of the healthy loaded Glenrothes article). nobody showed much enthuasism, so i decided to do it myself and so it could keep a better line with fellow Scottish towns this way.

anyway, don't worry about those pictures for the Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy article. i'll do these myself Kilnburn (talk) 17:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i've just noticed that the War Memorial Gardens picture is stated with showing the entrance to the library, it's actually the Art Museum and Gallery one. just to let you know Kilnburn (talk) 10:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

anyway, it was only last night when i saw your comment on the picture shuffle. with the Uni of Dundee Kirkcaldy Campus picture, even though i liked it there i didn't there was enough info to justify a picture and thought it was more a nuisance that way. so that's fine and you know, i never thought of it as a dull red-brick building before.

but the problem i felt was more in the Shopping and Leisure section where two of the pictures clashed together, hence why i put one on the left and one on the right to relieve this and for the text to seam through. if you feel at a later date the sheriff court building should be moved into the pictures section, then i'll understand. thanks again Kilnburn (talk) 23:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

82.35.210.119

Njan, sir, can you either confirm or deny that you were editing as 82.35.210.119 (talk · contribs). Thanks. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 23:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

copy editing work on the Kirkcaldy article

hello, njan

just me here to say if you won't mind (and especially if you have enough time on your hands) to look over the Kirkcaldy article and do some copy editing work.

you might be aware you might not, but i recently completed a revamp of the article with lots of new sources, info and some pictures although this needs a good tidy-up before i put it under a peer review. i would like to try and aim for FA status if i can.

p.s. i had to remove your pictures. with the Adam Smith 220 High Street one in particular, there was not enough space in Famous people, once i removed the bulk of information to insert it. i may in the future re-write that section again and put it back in, depending on the outcome of the propable peer review. Kilnburn (talk) 01:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:TRS-80 Model 200 and Vaio.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:TRS-80 Model 200 and Vaio.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 23:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]