User talk:Nj4170

This is Nj4170's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Raisley (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

this is pretty far from meeting WP:CREATIVE. Basically there need to be references to show that the person has had a wide-spread, preferably national, impact.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Raisley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 08:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nj4170, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 08:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nj4170, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nj4170! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

18:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Raisley (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

IMDB isn't a reliable source and therefore cannot be used. Also, only one source was added between previous decline and resubmission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Raisley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 05:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Raisley (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Kudos to the subject for coding a useful app at their age and for getting involved in cinema, but unless the Raisley has seen a good deal of coverage from reliable sources of information that are independent of the subject, then they are not ready for their own Wikipedia article. The draft would have to show that they meet either the creative inclusion criteria for directors and other artists, or the more general biographical inclusion criteria. Right now there doesn't appear to be much coverage of the subject from reliable, independent sources. Thanks,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Raisley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 01:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Middletown High School South

You have made a number of edits adding Anthony Raisley as the developer of an app at the article for Middletown High School South. A review of your extremely limited Wikipedia experience of 50 or so edits shows that it is focused entirely on trying to create an article about Anthony Raisley and adding details about him to the article for Middletown High School South. Consensus appears clear that Raisley is not notable. It is probably worth mentioning that an app was created for the high school, but the encyclopedic aspect is that an app exists; who created it is irrelevant. The details will be removed again.

Take a look at WP:BRD. You've been bold, multiple times. Your edits have been reverted. It is now time for you to start discussing this issue and obtain consensus to support your changes. Repeatedly reinserting the change, as you have done, is a definition example of Wikipedia:Edit warring and can lead to blocks if violations persist. Alansohn (talk) 19:19, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Raisley (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability of the subject isn't demonstrated in the article. Tons of people on this planet have done what he's done (according to the article), and there's no reason why his actions merit a WP article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Raisley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 01:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Middletown South iPhone App

Hello, Nj4170. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Middletown South iPhone App".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anthony Raisley

Hello, Nj4170. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Anthony Raisley".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TopCipher (talk) 07:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Anthony Raisley

Draft:Anthony Raisley, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Anthony Raisley and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Anthony Raisley during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 05:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]