User talk:Nivzaq
Caucasus edits
[edit]Armenia is near universally recognized. While 1 country (Pakistan) does not have diplomatic relations with the country due to the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute. However, since the dispute is over with, we are unsure of Pakistan's current position. Also, no diplomatic relations does not imply lack of recognition. Countries can have formal or informal diplomatic relations with each other while at the same time choosing to recognize each other or not choosing to. Please see the established consensus at List of states with limited recognition. Transnistria, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia have either zero recognition or just a few states recognizing their independence. There is a vast difference between near universal recognition and virtually no recognition. They aren't the same. Furthermore, Armenia is a member of the United Nations, while South Ossetia and Abkhazia are not. Archives908 (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Caucasus, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Stop edit-warring Llacb47 (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
Welcome Nivzaq!I'm Paine Ellsworth, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
May 2024
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Black Sea. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why exactly do you want so much that unrecognized puppet entity pseudo-state ("Republic of Abkhazia") to be listed in the infobox? What interest do you have? Nivzaq (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Georgia Edits
[edit]Hi, thank you for your edits on Georgian Dream page. Despite our many differences, I at least believe the article is better because of you (in a way keeping the pro-western editors in check). I would like you to contribute to the Irakli Kobakhidze's wikipedia article by making constructive changes and additions as it is in quite a poor and pathetic state as of now. If you choose to contribute, please don't let the edits get too one-sided (I remember a year ago the article was in a shockingly flattering state). I also think it is appropriate to make an article for the "global war party" conspiracy theory, what do you think? Zlad! (talk) 23:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thank for your comment, I would think of editing Irakli Kobakhidze page, but I don't think I will have time right now to edit many pages. Nivzaq (talk) 23:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
POV
[edit]You have added a POV tag to the Georgian March article I worked on. Please discuss it with me on the talk page what you find biased there. Zlad! (talk) 11:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- The article is biased in a way to portray the party's positions in negative way instead of just presenting the positions as they are. Nivzaq (talk) 12:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate on this reply, but please take it to the talk page. Zlad! (talk) 12:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Collective UNM
[edit]I hope this is a wake up call to you that you've just genuinely been brainwashed by GD. A couple of days ago you called me a sensationalist for claiming that collective UNM included anyone other than UNM and its offshoots. Here you go. Here is Kobakhidze specifying that what Ivanishvili's cult actually wants is to turn this country into a goddamn Belarus and literally ban every single relevant pro-Western opposition party. (Labor is irrelevant and Khvirchi isn't pro-Western in the traditional sense) He literally listed out the parties, hope you wake up or at least stop being so disruptive with your editing.
https://netgazeti.ge/news/738901/ Zlad! (talk) 11:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- I did not call you sensationalist, I said the coverage was sensationalist.
- "Ban every single relevant pro-Western opposition party" - such wording is problematic from my point of view because - neither of these parties are being banend for the pro-Westernism. The ruling party did not claim that they are being banned for pro-Westernism, but for the real or perceived (!) association with the legacy of the rule of United National Movement - torture and abuse against citizens. I see this not being mentioned anywhere in the section so this is huge POV issue in my view. The wording "ban every single relevant pro-Western opposition party" implies that pro-Westernism is being banned, this is not at least what ruling party itself claims.
- The agenda of banning United National Movement has always been a huge talking point of the Georgian Dream party, always. Like since the foundation of party in 2011. The supporters of Georgian Dream hate United National Movement and its (real or perceived) offshoots very much and I don't think they find anything problematic in those statements, because they have asked for these bans for years. The Georgian Dream party actually did not implement its pre-election promises by not banning the UNM party and launching cohabition with them in 2012-2013.
- In my view, if you think that banning these parties would "negatively affect democracy" or "pro-Westernism" in Georgia, since that opinion is also voiced by some sources, it is okay to mention that. However, it should also 100% be mentioned the ruling party opinion, that those are criminal organizations which tortured people and abused them for 9 years from 2003-2012. Also, that their Western associates tried very hard to shield them from responsibility when they lost power in 2012-2013. And that Saakashvili was loved by Western neocons (Bush's famous "beacon of democracy" remark in 2005). Also, the claims of the ruling party are indeed real in many cases since 80% of mentioned parties are indeed offshoots of UNM (for example, Ahali, Droa, Girchi - Japaridze infamously said that he knew about tortures but did not think it was a problem). However, some parties are indeed not UNM offshoots - Citizens, For Georgia, For the People. However, ruling party opinion should be mentioned that they perceive these parties as UNM accomplices in getting back to power.
- In conclusion, my view is that ruling party opinion should 100% be mentioned as the passage can not be neutral in any other way. And this is not just an opinion of ruling party, this is the opinion of significant number of Georgians who consider UNM and its associates as criminals for their tortures in 2003-2012. Nivzaq (talk) 22:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Look I also don't like UNM. I also consider their rule as authoritarian... but what the hell does Lelo and Gakharia have to do with it? And no I don't think their reasoning for banning UNM is either valid (no matter how much I may think they screwed up and committed crimes during those 9 years) and especially don't think banning "their accomplices" is excusable. It is very clear that they want controlled opposition of Khvirchi, maybe Chergo!, Natela, and Patriots and that's it.
- Anyway to diverge from my opinion. I think "major pro-Western" is necessary to include as those are indeed all parties that are regularly labeled pro-Western and have a chance of entering the parliament. But I agree that their explanation should be added which I will do today. Zlad! (talk) 22:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also an important thing I’ll add is that Wikipedia prioritizes third party analysis of the positions rather than the party’s official claimed positions. Zlad! (talk) 23:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I added a sentence about the party’s reasoning for the ban. Zlad! (talk) 23:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also an important thing I’ll add is that Wikipedia prioritizes third party analysis of the positions rather than the party’s official claimed positions. Zlad! (talk) 23:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
edit summaries
[edit]hey - thanks for your large contributions to Zviad Gamsakhurdia! i'd suggest you use edit summaries more often though, especially with large edits to controversial articles (like Gamsakhurdia's). it will make it less likely that someone watching the article does a double take. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 16:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Alliance of Patriots
[edit]Hi, do you know if Georgian Idea and Georgian March are technically running on Patriot’s list or no? Have they formed an electoral coalition and if they have can you provide a source? Thanks Zlad! (talk) 00:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have a source, but they most likely do. Nivzaq (talk) 09:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah I couldn’t find a source either. If you find something, let me know. Zlad! (talk) 09:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have a source, but they most likely do. Nivzaq (talk) 09:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
2024 Georgian parliamentary election
[edit]Hi, there are various discussions going on the talk page of 2024 parliamentary election. Since you are active on the article it will be good to hear your input as well. Zlad! (talk) 23:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
IPs
[edit]Why are you editing using IPs? Is your IP banned and you're using VPNs and that is the reason? Whatever the case, there is something really suspicious about your activity. Zlad! (talk) 11:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, am not sure what you mean, but I am editing with my account. I don't see reason why I would need to edit with IPs. Can you specify what you mean?Nivzaq (talk) 11:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think you're being truthful, but whatever. Maybe you think you're editing with your own account, but it is showing as IPs. It may border on a case of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Zlad! (talk) 11:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think I have edited without logging in (?), but I would take account of your comment, thank you for notifying, but it would be good if you specified any examples. Nivzaq (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- The edits by IPs on UNM, GD, and Girchi articles all point the finger at you. Not that there is anything wrong with those edits by themselves. Zlad! (talk) 11:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I will check out, thanks. Nivzaq (talk) 11:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- The edits by IPs on UNM, GD, and Girchi articles all point the finger at you. Not that there is anything wrong with those edits by themselves. Zlad! (talk) 11:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think I have edited without logging in (?), but I would take account of your comment, thank you for notifying, but it would be good if you specified any examples. Nivzaq (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think you're being truthful, but whatever. Maybe you think you're editing with your own account, but it is showing as IPs. It may border on a case of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Zlad! (talk) 11:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)