User talk:Nivas10798
Some links to help you !
[edit]
|
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, Nivas10798! Thank you for your contributions. I am Krishna Chaitanya Velaga and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:37, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Nivas10798! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 13:48, Monday, September 3, 2018 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
DYK nomination of R. Hari Kumar
[edit]Hello! Your submission of R. Hari Kumar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kingsif (talk) 19:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Draft:G. S. Pabby
[edit]Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.indiannavy.nic.in/node/380, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: I am sorry about that thing. I just kept those sentences as a mark of reference, so that I can replace them as soon as I find a better modification for them. I promise you that I will not repeat this mistake in future. Thank you! Nivas10798 (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Great Work!
[edit]Hey, very nice work on R. Hari Kumar :) —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 18:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Sarvatra: Thank you very much! :) —Nivas10798 (talk) 06:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/R. Hari Kumar at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 12:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
DYK for R. Hari Kumar
[edit]On 1 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article R. Hari Kumar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that R. Hari Kumar took a staff course at the US Naval War College while serving in the Indian Navy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/R. Hari Kumar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, R. Hari Kumar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]This is the only warning you will receive for using inflammatory, derogatory, or racist language. Using this kind of content outside of a purely encyclopedic context is considered vandalism. Please review this policy before posting again. If you use inflammatory, derogatory, or racist language on Wikipedia in violation of this policy again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. KCVelaga (talk) 07:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:G. S. Pabby
[edit]Draft:G. S. Pabby: The article seems ready to be published. What do you say? —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 14:19, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Sarvatra: There is some more information to be added and I think that this article is most likely to get nominated for copy-edit. Can you suggest few modifications for this article please? —Nivas10798 (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject India
[edit]Namaste, Nivas10798. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
WikiConference India 2020: IRC today
[edit]{{subst:WCI2020-IRC (Oct 2019)}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
WikiConference India 2020: IRC today
[edit]Greetings, thanks for taking part in the initial conversation around the proposal for WikiConference India 2020 in Hyderabad. Firstly, we are happy to share the news that there has been a very good positive response from individual Wikimedians. Also there have been community-wide discussions on local Village Pumps on various languages. Several of these discussions have reached consensus, and supported the initiative. To conclude this initial conversation and formalise the consensus, an IRC is being hosted today evening. We can clear any concerns/doubts that we have during the IRC. Looking forward to your participation.
The details of the IRC are
- Timings and Date: 6:00 pm IST (12:30 pm UTC) on 20 August 2019
- Website: https://webchat.freenode.net/
- Channel: #wci
Note: Initially, all the users who have engaged on WikiConference India 2020: Initial conversations page or its talk page were added to the WCI2020 notification list. Members of this list will receive regular updates regarding WCI2020. If you would like to opt-out or change the target page, please do so on this page.
This message is being sent again because template substitution failed on non-Meta-Wiki Wikis. Sorry for the inconvenience. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Your AfD comment
[edit]No, Your reply isn't helping at all. It seems to me that you are missing the entire point of the . AfD. How will the judgement or not having it affect an article ? What makes you think that people will not be looking t read this article ? you should answer these questions when you reply there. currently the reply isn't addressing these questions. I hope you do understand that it takes 10-15 years to get judgement. I am not sure if you know this or not but Articles that are moved to Draft can only stay upto 6 months after that they are automatically deleted, if no update. There has to be a policy based reason behind whatever point you are making there. I would also suggest you to read Wikipedia:Introduction_to_deletion_process and WP:PRESERVE. Since I feel that you are not very familiar with our deletion process and how it works. I decided to make this comment here and not at AfD since it is a general comment to help you familarize with the AfD process and posting it there on AfD will start an unwanted side discussion that will be offtopic. If you have any further questions, please do ping me and ask here and I will be glad to help. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- @DBigXray:Hello! Thanks for pointing out those things. I should have generalized and said rule/law along with judgment. I felt that this article is very important to be on the mainspace and any reader who is going through a series of such articles should watch it. Since it got nominated for deletion with no proper reason and purpose, I suggested to move the article to draft in order to preserve it. I know that there will be a very huge delay in the judgment, but I guess that some action or law can come out as a quick response because there are many agitations happening in either of the Telugu states. Recently Andhra Pradesh DGP has implemented "zero FIR" rule because the family of rape victim alleged that the police delayed the filing of FIR over jurisdiction issues. Similarly, there are few other rules which are being implemented in other states for the safety of women. I would like to thank you for supporting the article to be on mainspace. I will ping you, in case of doubts/suggestions. Thank you! --Nivas10798 (talk) 16:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- "
Since it got nominated for deletion with no proper reason and purpose,
" If you feel that the nomination was inappropriate, the right thing to do would be to vote keep stating the same. Draftifying is only done when there are reasons to do so. see WP:ATD-I."I guess that some action or law can come out as a quick response
" Do you really believe a law may come out within 6 months ? I wont be so sure, considering how slow the parliament works. Indeed You are right, the article needs to be expanded about the Zero FIR. Telangana was not folowing it while the rest of the country was following it. Please do mention this in the article by adding a reliable source and also in your comments on the AfD. It would be good to clarify on the AfD page and on teh article that this rape case brought some changes in the policy, Zero FIR is one such change, thanks for mentioning it. Cheers. --DBigXrayᗙ 16:45, 5 December 2019 (UTC)- @DBigXray: That was a wonderful suggestion. Will definitely add a subsection in the Aftermath section regarding "zero FIR" and ping you. Hope this subsection can make the article attain more encyclopediac value. Hurray! Thanks for great suggestion :) . --Nivas10798 (talk) 18:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- "
New message from DBigXray
[edit]Message added 12:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DBigXrayᗙ 12:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- @DBigXray: I guess you can understand the difference between 'Draftify' and 'Delete'. Kindly check the page, I suggested to draftify and not delete. I am one among those who wanted this article to be in the mainspace because I felt that this is really a very important issue which should be know to the world. Nivas10798 (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Please confirm if you have read WP:ATD-I ? You keep on repeating the same thing, but you fail to understand that the reasons for your vote and the vote dont agree with each other. --DBigXrayᗙ 18:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- @DBigXray: Yes, I have gone through WP:ATD-I. I explained you that I should have generalised and said law/rule along with judgment. I also added that there are many laws being implemented in many states of India which will support the article to be of high encyclopediac value, which means in no time the artcile cane be moved from draft to mainsapce. Do you agree to this point of mine?
- Yes, I agree. But you have to understand that WP:AFD is not a discussion to find out if the article is of high encyclopedic value or basic ____. AFD is to judge if it is encyclopedic or not. You seem to have agreed that it is encyclopedic, and yet you were voting to draftify, that is what was creating confusion and DTM asked you for a clarification. You see, if an article is considered encyclopedic, it can remain on the mainspace even if it is a one line article called WP:STUB. There is no requirement that one has to wait for a topic to become a high importance or high quality before it can stay on the mainspace. see WP:WIP--DBigXrayᗙ 18:50, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- @DBigXray: Ok, I got it. Thanks -Nivas10798 (talk) 02:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. But you have to understand that WP:AFD is not a discussion to find out if the article is of high encyclopedic value or basic ____. AFD is to judge if it is encyclopedic or not. You seem to have agreed that it is encyclopedic, and yet you were voting to draftify, that is what was creating confusion and DTM asked you for a clarification. You see, if an article is considered encyclopedic, it can remain on the mainspace even if it is a one line article called WP:STUB. There is no requirement that one has to wait for a topic to become a high importance or high quality before it can stay on the mainspace. see WP:WIP--DBigXrayᗙ 18:50, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- @DBigXray: Yes, I have gone through WP:ATD-I. I explained you that I should have generalised and said law/rule along with judgment. I also added that there are many laws being implemented in many states of India which will support the article to be of high encyclopediac value, which means in no time the artcile cane be moved from draft to mainsapce. Do you agree to this point of mine?
- Please confirm if you have read WP:ATD-I ? You keep on repeating the same thing, but you fail to understand that the reasons for your vote and the vote dont agree with each other. --DBigXrayᗙ 18:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
[WikiConference India 2020] Invitation to participate in the Community Engagement Survey
[edit]This is an invitation to participate in the Community Engagement Survey, which is one of the key requirements for drafting the Conference & Event Grant application for WikiConference India 2020 to the Wikimedia Foundation. The survey will have questions regarding a few demographic details, your experience with Wikimedia, challenges and needs, and your expectations for WCI 2020. The responses will help us to form an initial idea of what is expected out of WCI 2020, and draft the grant application accordingly. Please note that this will not directly influence the specificities of the program, there will be a detailed survey to assess the program needs post-funding decision.
- Please fill the survey at; https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd7_hpoIKHxGW31RepX_y4QxVqoodsCFOKatMTzxsJ2Vbkd-Q/viewform
- The survey will be open until 23:59 hrs of 22 December 2019.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
[WikiConference India 2020] Conference & Event Grant proposal
[edit]WikiConference India 2020 team is happy to inform you that the Conference & Event Grant proposal for WikiConference India 2020 has been submitted to the Wikimedia Foundation. This is to notify community members that for the last two weeks we have opened the proposal for community review, according to the timeline, post notifying on Indian Wikimedia community mailing list. After receiving feedback from several community members, certain aspects of the proposal and the budget have been changed. However, community members can still continue engage on the talk page, for any suggestions/questions/comments. After going through the proposal + FAQs, if you feel contented, please endorse the proposal at WikiConference_India_2020#Endorsements, along with a rationale for endorsing this project. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members list.
[edit]Hi Nivas10798! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)