User talk:Nittavinoda
Disambiguation link notification for February 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agastya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dvaraka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]I have replied to you at Talk:Velir#Reverting_edit_by_Sitush. - Sitush (talk) 15:59, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- replied thereNittavinoda (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Inscriptions
[edit]Please stop adding information about ancient inscriptions to articles unless they are discussed in a modern reliable source. Merely cataloguing the inscription is insufficient, as is citing something compiled in the British Raj era. - Sitush (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- I have not added the inscription. Tirumagal pola with prasasti is adding inscription. But I have merely mentioned what has been translated and interpreted by hisorians. Moreover, all the Chola articles are riding on Sastri's work which is purely based on inscriptions and is also a colonial era work. This being the case, I do not see any harm in adding the inscriptions. I suggest you stop stalking my edits. Nittavinoda (talk) 11:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- I am not stalking anyone. That article has been on my watchlist for years and you can see my past involvement with it in the edit history. As for Raj stuff, well, tough: the community's consensus is clear. - Sitush (talk) 12:00, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Not quite. For example, User regentspark has accepted the evidence for article Velir based on inscription [1] if it was being inferred by a historian like Sastri. So stop pushing your opinion. Nittavinoda (talk) 12:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- RP is mistaken, and does note that there is some doubt regarding which Sastri is being referred to. The problem is in any event that much interpretation of history has changed since the Raj era and thus we do not use things from the time. This has been discussed time and again at WP:RSN, which has a wider community support than merely the hedged opinion of one person. - Sitush (talk) 12:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- As regards to Chola articles, all the references by recent and older authors/hisotrians use information from inscriptions only. If there were no inscriptions then all the stuff regarding his conquests and achievements in the article Rajaraja Chola I must disappear. It is only his inscriptions and those of his peers that allow historians to state and conclude the events and the political scenario during his period Nittavinoda (talk) 12:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. Use the modern sources. To be honest, I think the Inscriptions section should be scrapped anyway because it adds nothing but clutter. We could just say "Ancient inscriptions have been identified at temples A, B and C." and cite this. - Sitush (talk) 14:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- As regards to Chola articles, all the references by recent and older authors/hisotrians use information from inscriptions only. If there were no inscriptions then all the stuff regarding his conquests and achievements in the article Rajaraja Chola I must disappear. It is only his inscriptions and those of his peers that allow historians to state and conclude the events and the political scenario during his period Nittavinoda (talk) 12:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- RP is mistaken, and does note that there is some doubt regarding which Sastri is being referred to. The problem is in any event that much interpretation of history has changed since the Raj era and thus we do not use things from the time. This has been discussed time and again at WP:RSN, which has a wider community support than merely the hedged opinion of one person. - Sitush (talk) 12:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Not quite. For example, User regentspark has accepted the evidence for article Velir based on inscription [1] if it was being inferred by a historian like Sastri. So stop pushing your opinion. Nittavinoda (talk) 12:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- I am not stalking anyone. That article has been on my watchlist for years and you can see my past involvement with it in the edit history. As for Raj stuff, well, tough: the community's consensus is clear. - Sitush (talk) 12:00, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- I have not added the inscription. Tirumagal pola with prasasti is adding inscription. But I have merely mentioned what has been translated and interpreted by hisorians. Moreover, all the Chola articles are riding on Sastri's work which is purely based on inscriptions and is also a colonial era work. This being the case, I do not see any harm in adding the inscriptions. I suggest you stop stalking my edits. Nittavinoda (talk) 11:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
I have replied in Rajendra talk page. I have also listed out the reasons for adding the Inscription Section in the first place. I'll go with user opinion and whatever Wiki readers/users/community want. Nittavinoda (talk) 15:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Alert
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.- Sitush (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Boothi Vikramakesari) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Boothi Vikramakesari, Nittavinoda!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
A well-written article and a useful addition to Wikipedia. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:45, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kulottunga I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glossary of Buddhism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaolin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, please stop futzing with article italics until you are fully aware of our various guidelines for the use of italics. See MOS:ITALICS. Italics are not decorations. Generally speaking, we use italics for titles of major works like movies, books, albums, television series, etc., so your removal of the italics from here is not constructive. It's also unclear why you italicised Khmer, as this is a regular proper noun, not a title of a major work, or why you italicised Pandiyan, as again, this is a proper noun. Same at Vedi, which is a place. We don't italicise locations. India, for example is not italicised. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:01, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- I've reverted about 30 of these for you. Can you please go through the bulk of your recent edits and fix the others? It would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:32, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, I was not aware of the guidelines. I'll take care going forward. Thanks Nittavinoda (talk) 00:35, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Generally speaking all community preferences for layout, for everything from dates to currency to use of bold and italic, can be found at our Manual of Style. Other communities have their own manuals of style, like WP:FILM, etc. Can you help go through the remainder of your edits where you may have erroneously made these changes, please? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, I've reverted them, should be okay now. Cheers. Nittavinoda (talk) 02:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Much appreciated. I'll go away.
Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:28, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Much appreciated. I'll go away.
- Hi, I've reverted them, should be okay now. Cheers. Nittavinoda (talk) 02:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Generally speaking all community preferences for layout, for everything from dates to currency to use of bold and italic, can be found at our Manual of Style. Other communities have their own manuals of style, like WP:FILM, etc. Can you help go through the remainder of your edits where you may have erroneously made these changes, please? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, I was not aware of the guidelines. I'll take care going forward. Thanks Nittavinoda (talk) 00:35, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kanyakumari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Kulottunga I
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kulottunga I you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Puducherry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Kulottunga I
[edit]The article Kulottunga I you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kulottunga I for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Nittavinoda. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thirumangai alvar
[edit]திருமங்கை ஆழ்வார் முத்தரையர் சமுதாயத்தை சார்ந்தவர் இப்பக்கம் உருவாக்கிய பொழுதே முத்தரையர் என்று தான் இருந்தது.நீங்கள் தேவையில்லாமல் கள்ளர் சமுதாயம் என்று கூறி இரு சமுதாயத்தினர் இடையே பிரச்சனையை ஏற்படுத்த வேண்டாம் .Thank you--Jkalaiarasan86 (talk) 12:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Special Barnstar |
| For your good work on Kulottunga I Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 02:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Kulottunga I
[edit]The article Kulottunga I you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Kulottunga I for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 08:21, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Parama padam (disambiguation) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parama padam (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.