User talk:Nishupat

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Nishupat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 15:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Air India does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! — LeoFrank ^Talk 02:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Air India A320 in Star Alliance Livery at mumbai july 12 , 2014.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Air India A320 in Star Alliance Livery at mumbai july 12 , 2014.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ///EuroCarGT 04:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wanna collaborate?

Wikipedia is a collaborative project. The outcomes are more rewarding when users work as a team. Would you like to collaborate with me? --PeterCRames (talk) 13:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:A320Neo (New Engine Option) Roll out.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:A320Neo (New Engine Option) Roll out.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 01:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ethiopian Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Andrewgprout. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ATR 72, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andrewgprout (talk) 01:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Vistara. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at IndiGo. Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at IndiGo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — LeoFrank ^Talk 08:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=I had put source from Planespotters.net on IndiGo wiki page as [41] but they still block me and I am new to wikipedia so i didnt know so please unblock me and 2nd thing IndiGo have got 3 ATR72-600 Delivered 1 in Nov and 2 in Dec 2017 so what i did was right anyone can check on IndiGo on Planespotters.net site for IndiGo fleet. my edit was 100% correct and i was not vandalize wikipedia check this link out then tell me I was wrong >> https://www.planespotters.net/airline/IndiGo?p=3 ~~~~}}

. Alexf^(talk) 12:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Planespotters is not a reliable source, so stop using it as a reference.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: . -- ferret (talk) 15:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishupat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not make any changes again until I have reliable source to go with it so I request to you kindly unblock my account now please.

Decline reason:

Given the comment below, I think it would be better if you take the time off to read WP:Identifying reliable sources. Huon (talk) 01:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

! Thank You and Jetstreamer you should change IndiGo ATR72 they have got 3 ATR72 in service check IndiGo FB or Twitter ~~~~ {{unblock reviewed | 1=I didnt knew that Planespotters.net was npt reliable source on wikipedia so Ikindly request to you all unblock my account give second chance please | decline = If you do not know how to distinguish a reliable source from an unreliable source, how on earth can we know that you will not simply make the same errors again? Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:30, 9 January 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishupat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is not fair I am new here and this is unfair blocking and trust me Yunshui I will not edit unless I have wikipedia reliable source with me I also have right to free speech here SoI request to all please UNBLOCK My Account ! Thank you !NP 09:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are confused. You have no right to free speech here. See WP:FREESPEECH. You need to convince us you understand WP:V and WP:RS. You've already explicitly stated that you don't understand WP:RS and we can't unblock you until you demonstrate an understanding. What about planespotters.net makes it fail WP:RS? What's an example of a more reliable source you could use instead? Yamla (talk) 11:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishupat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will read all that thing about editing in wikipedia or making changes then only I will do editing here you guys dont want to me 2nd chance cause you are good at it thats not fair Jetstremer come on help me unblock my account you can trust me 100% Big Fat PLEASE unblock my account I need Another chance I am new here I deserve 2nd chance this is kind of bullying going here which is not fair !

Decline reason:

As above, you will need to convince us that you understand those policies - not that you will eventually understand / read them. SQL ^{Query me!} 22:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishupat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I totally understand those policies and I will understand those policies now can you please UNBLOCK MY ACCOUNT ! this totally bullying going on here I need 2nd chance I said I will those policies then only I will make chances then also you guys dont understand me TRUST ME PLEASE PLEASE PLEAS E !

Decline reason:

Not convincing at all and worse, you appear to be having CIR issues.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One unblock request at a time, please. You still have refused to answer these questions: "What about planespotters.net makes it fail WP:RS? What's an example of a more reliable source you could use instead?" --Yamla (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I mean If Planespotters.net fails then I will try to find new website that say airline have got these many aircraft i their fleet and if not then I will erase it the changes and leave it as it was like cancel the changes simple answer so now can I get UNBLOCK Please ! Yamla (talk)

That's up to the next reviewing admin. I certainly wouldn't unblock you with that. You've claimed you totally understand our policies, but have demonstrated you haven't the slightest idea of how WP:RS works. --Yamla (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nishant28 appears to be an unused account that belongs to Nishupat.

Observations: At the present, there are 712 links on en.wiki to planespotters.net . From making several spot checks, I find many to most of these links are "Page not found". There was a posting to the Reliable Sources Noticeboard asking about this source but it went without response. There was also a previous posting at RSN several years ago that suggested that it isn't a reliable source. It is heavily linked cross wiki.

There is an existing COIBot report (permanent link) from several years ago. I have poked it to make a more current report but it seems to be taking a very long time and not finished but the updated version should land at Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/planespotters.net (check history for version date).

BilCat and others in the Aviation projects may have opinions on these links. Maybe a discussion is warranted somewhere.

While looking into the link I found that the primary person to have added it to en.wiki in the old report was Mustangmanxxx (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Upon running a check, I find that they are Technically indistinguishable to Inspector123 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). They also like to edit frequently while logged out.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishupat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

COME ON I AM NEW TO WIKIPEDIA PLEASE UNBLOCK MY ACCOUNT you guys are bullying me ITS ENOUGH NOW LET ME HAVE 2ND CHANCE PLEASE 🙏🙏🙏🙏 THIS IS TOTALLY UNFAIR BLOCK I said I will read all wikipedia policies before editing so whats the problem guys NOT FAIR 😢😢 Please Unblock my account I BIG BIG Request to to all of you any next admin review my unblock req just unblock my account I need 2nd chance fully request you please I will read all policies of wikipedia just forget it planespotters.net site and UNBLOCK MY ACCOUNT ferret can you please please UNBLOCK MY ACCOUNT !

Decline reason:

I'd say that you should retract the legal threat first, but to be honest: I don't think you have the skills to edit Wikipedia even when you have done so. That information on Wikipedia needs to be backed up with reliable sources is a non-negotiable policy - WP:V - and you don't seem to understand this concept even after several attempts by others to explain it. Pleading in allcaps is not enough - at a minimum, you need to explain what a reliable source is and how you plan to apply the concept to your future edits. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We do not permit legal threats here. Please see WP:NLT. As per your legal threat, I have extended your block indefinitely. If you unconditionally withdraw your legal threat, any admin is free to shorten your block back to its original duration, ending no sooner than 2018-01-20. --Yamla (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I still say this unfair block I didnt do anything wrong and put my block setting where it was please bro I need my account and you know I am new here on wikipedia I am just frausted of this block Yamla (talk)

If your next edit is not an unconditional retraction of your legal threat, you will lose access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 02:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nishupat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PLEASE PLEASE UNLOCK MY ACCOUNT GUYS I WILL UNDERSTAND ALL THINGS about editing and READ policies I need 2nd chance every human makes mistake and I am also human try giving me 2nd chance Pleaseeeeeee ! :) I am just Frasuted about this NP 21:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This isn't going anywhere so I'm revoking talk page access. PhilKnight (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nishupat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20394 was submitted on Jan 20, 2018 23:59:00. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nishupat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20438 was submitted on Jan 25, 2018 20:59:28. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nishupat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20633 was submitted on Feb 15, 2018 23:52:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nishupat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20945 was submitted on Mar 21, 2018 01:09:41. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]