User talk:Nirmal7786

Welcome!

Hello, Nirmal7786, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nittawinoda (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for archaeological claims should be peer reviewed articles

Not the media, which frequently get this sort of thing wrong. And usually not state-sponsored reports, especially when they come from revisionist governments. Doug Weller talk 09:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Its official. I know you guys can't digest this truth. It's ok. Nirmal7786 (talk) 14:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Governments always tell the truth now? Any archaeologist or Radiocarbon dating specialist will tell you that when someone gives you the exact date for something that old it's nonsense. I'll guarantee you the lab that dated it didn't make that claim, they would have givena range. But all that is by the bye, as always we need to see what other archaeologists make of the final report. Do you even know some of the issues that are involved in this sort of thing? And who in the world are "you guys"? Doug Weller talk 14:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]