User talk:Poohrwah

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. —Cryptic 13:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nirbhay Pathik - Newspaper

My page is for a Newspaper and not an organisation. Being the first of its kind in Mumbai, we wanted the viewer to be versed with the history of journalism in Mumbai.

Kindly help in creating a valuable page. Thanks. Nirbhay Pathik (talk) 03:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Poohrwah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22373 was submitted on Aug 16, 2018 04:03:36. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nirbhay Pathik

My page is for a Newspaper and not an organisation. Being the first of its kind in Mumbai, we wanted the viewer to be versed with the history of journalism in Mumbai.

Kindly help in creating a valuable page. Thanks. Nirbhay Pathik (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nirbhay Pathik

My page is for a Newspaper and not an organisation. Being the first of its kind in Mumbai, we wanted the viewer to be versed with the history of journalism in Mumbai. Example of similar pages are Jansatta, Navbharat Times etc.

Thus on the similar lines we have created our content to let public know the glorious start of. Hindi journalism in Mumbai.

Kindly help in creating a valuable page. Thanks. Nirbhay Pathik (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A newspaper *is* an organization, and organizations/groups/multiple accounts are not allowed here (so no "We" accounts). Please follow the instructions in the block message if you wish to contribute here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will change the language

Thank you team for guiding us.

We will update our language now. Nirbhay Pathik (talk) 00:26, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Language change

I wish to edit my language, is that possible now? Nirbhay Pathik (talk) 00:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My language do you mean username? Follow the instructions in the block message. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:58, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Language as on content

The user name Nirbhay Pathik cannot change as it is the name of the newspaper. I was hinting at changing the content. Nirbhay Pathik (talk) 08:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It has been explained to you several times that you cannot have a username that represents any kind of organization (and a newspaper counts as an organization). You must request a change of username if you wish to edit here, and multiple comments which refuse to do that will eventually lead to your losing your ability to edit this talk page too. So, please, follow the instructions in the block message for requesting a change of username. This is your last chance. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Injustice and Unclear

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poohrwah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Team, The page we are trying to create is not an organisation, it is incorrect and injustice to name it as an organisation. Neither is the same a promotional gesture, this is being wrongly blocked. I see so many pages of newspaper (which are actually an organisation) example of them are : Jansatta, The Hindu, The Indian Express, Navbharat Times and many more. This is injustice on your part to treat Nirbhay Pathik as an organisation when it has a historical past associated and refraining the viewers to miss on enhancing their knowledge of journalistic history in Mumbai and India. This is really disappointing when actual organisations have their pages on Wikipedia but a content which is truly based on facts is regarded as Organisation. I would request you to read the content first before calling it a block. Whatever content that has been written is solely on the history and promoting any present activity. Your help is valuable to me. Thank You. Nirbhay Pathik (talk) 07:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Nirbhay Pathik (talk) 07:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This block is correct. As you have been told several times, a newspaper is an organization, and as such your username cannot be that of your newspaper per the username policy. Your username must be that of an individual (you don't have to use your real name) and indicate that only one person is using it. If you wish your newspaper's name to be part of your username, a name in the format of "YourName of Nirbhay Pathik" would be acceptable. You also keep using "we"; accounts cannot be shared. You will not be allowed to edit until you change your username. Though not part of your block, you should also read WP:COI and WP:PAID before attempting to write about your newspaper. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 07:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll just add that you mention Jansatta, The Hindu, The Indian Express, Navbharat Times. But those are articles not usernames. There is no User:Jansatta, User:The Hindu, etc. Nobody is saying we can't have an article about Nirbhay Pathik, just that it can not have its own group account or username. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Change of Username

Thank you team, this helped me. Apologies for bothering.

I will change the username

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Poohrwah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

poohrwah (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

to comply with username policy Nirbhay Pathik (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Renamed and unblocked, welcome back. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, that username is already taken, so please amend your request to specify a different one. You can check if a desired username is free using Special:CentralAuth. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged the requests, as only one open one is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 19:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Team

Apologies to bother. Thanks for the help. Just a quick query. Usually on the right hand side we see the box which has image and some quick vital information related to the page. How can we get that for Nirbhay Pathik. also, if you could let me know what is that section called and how does it populate on the page. Thanks Poohrwah (talk) 21:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking an update

Hello Team, Hope you doing well! Thank you for helping me on the Page Nirbhay Pathik. I was just seeking an update as to when can I see the page go live. What is the turn around time.?

Thank you.

Poohrwah (talk) 06:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have not formally submitted the draft for review. I will add the appropriate means to allow you to do so. Once you submit it, it will likely take several weeks to be reviewed. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Submitted earlier

Hi,

Thank you for looking into the request. I had submitted earlier and received an email confirmation as well that due to bulk submissions you people may take 4-8 weeks.

Please assist in submitting my data for review. Thank you. Poohrwah (talk) 14:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your draft(unless I am looking at the wrong one), you still have not actually submitted it. You need to click "Submit this draft for review!" in the box at the top of your draft. 331dot (talk) 14:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am unable to locate the submit key now. Please can you guide?

Thank you Poohrwah (talk) 15:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to your draft, I placed a large box at the top of the page. On it, there is a blue button that has the words "Submit this draft for review!". If you click those words, an edit window will appear, but you don't need to change anything. Simply scroll down to the "publish" button(as with any other edit window) and click that to save. That will submit your draft. 331dot (talk) 15:24, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have submitted the draft for review.

I had done this step earlier too, don't know why it did not get publish then.

Please can you look into this and let me know if the submission is accurately done.

Thanks. Poohrwah (talk) 15:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you have now successfully submitted it. It will likely take some time to be reviewed, likely several weeks. You will be told the result of the review. 331dot (talk) 15:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Team,

It has been more than 5-6 weeks now, I have not received an update on this. Please can you let me know by when the draft can go live.

Thank you Poohrwah (talk) 06:19, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nirbhay Pathik (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nirbhay Pathik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nirbhay Pathik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Poohrwah! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! K.e.coffman (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Poohrwah (talk) 05:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)== Re-editing possible ==[reply]

Hi Team,

Thank you for looking into this. Just wanted to know if I can re-edit the content and rewrite it with a even more neutral outlook. Also, please can you confirm if there are no issues with references mentioned in the article.

Thanks. Poohrwah (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you may re-edit the draft and submit it again. You will also need to read WP:COI and WP:PAID. I am not able to look at the references at this time. 331dot (talk) 11:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have submitted the edited version. Please advise if the same is as per policies and guidelines. Poohrwah (talk) 11:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Team,

Have submitted the edited version. Please advise if the same is as per policies and guidelines. Poohrwah (talk) 05:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Poohrwah! You created a thread called Assistance in validating my draft. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nirbhay Pathik (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"The newspaper was accompanied by renowned and fearless writers"...

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nirbhay Pathik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nirbhay Pathik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 12:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Poohrwah (talk) 07:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Team,

I have removed all possible words and re-framed the sentences that portray the article to be like an advertisement.

Request you to please assist and provide your valuable feeds on this.

Thank you.

Poohrwah (talk) 07:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nirbhay Pathik (May 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by QueerEcofeminist were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I fear the subject of this article could not qualify WP:NNEWSPAPER in addition to being promotional in tone and lack of neutral language. thanks

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 05:45, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nirbhay Pathik concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nirbhay Pathik, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nirbhay Pathik concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nirbhay Pathik, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nirbhay Pathik

Hello, Poohrwah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nirbhay Pathik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:09, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]