User talk:Nippierd
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.
Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.
If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 08:58, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with your image uploads
[edit]Thanks for uploading images of yourself and of your work to Wikipedia. I noticed that, while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that any of the photographers of these images agreed to license it under the given license.
If these images were done under a "work for hire" contract, please send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of these images via a contract (It will help to include a copy of this contract showing the photographer(s) were hired this way) and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If there were no contracts, or the images were not created as a work for hire, please ask the photographer(s) of the image(s) to take the steps listed above, or if the photographer has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. It is important to note that an image of a living person that merely shows what they look like to be replaceable by free-licensed images and unsuitable for the project. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 19:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nippierd/Louise nippierd
[edit]A tag has been placed on User:Nippierd/Louise nippierd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 19:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
July 2011
[edit]Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Rafael Nadal, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. roh. (talk) 09:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)