User talk:Nipisiquit

Hello Nipisiquit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Benjamin stewart05 :-) 14:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

pt.wiki

Hi! You've seemed to have edited with bot tools without having community approval, so you've been blocked. If you want to have bot flag, or do normal edits please report. Epinheiro (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am not familiar with the proper use of a bot. Do I need to have bot flag because I only edit interwiki? In addition, I don't know how I can "report" in pt.wiki while I am still blocked. Please help!--Nipisiquit (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can report here :) You need botflag if you use any automatic edit tool, did you used? Epinheiro (talk) 15:25, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not use any automatic edit tool when I fix interwiki. I fix interwiki mostly when interwiki links do not match in contents and need to be linked with more appropriate articles in different languages. I don't think bots can recognize whether an article in language A is equivalent of another article in language B or not. I try to check all the links for correctness, which is easier for biology-related articles because scientific names (universal!) are used. Bots are a convenient way to keep interwiki links up to date, but I believe human brains need to check the interwiki links once in a while...--Nipisiquit (talk) 17:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been unblocked sorry for the mistake. Happy editing, Epinheiro (talk) 14:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obligato! I will be back in pt.wiki soon. --Nipisiquit (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pittosporum tobira

You removed sc:Pittosporo from en:Pittosporum because you say that the Sardinian word Pittosporo is about Pittosporum tobira, O.K. in that case some interwikis with sc:Pittosporo haven't been removed, I ask you please that remove sc:Pittosporo from the remaining interwikis about Pittosporum: de:Klebsamen, es:Pittosporum, fr:Pittosporum, it:Pittosporum, ja:トベラ属, and ru:Смолосемянник becuse the links are duplicated and many trouble are going to appear...--Jaguarlaser (talk) 17:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Proserpina (gastropod) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*''[[Proserpina bidentata]]'' C. B. Adams, 1850)<ref name="Rosenberg 2009"/>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nipisiquit. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]