User talk:Ninjaediator

Feel free to ask me your questions.

Mr Ninja

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nutan Rathore, without any read article. Please review the guidelines Shivkishni (talk) 15:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May I know which guideline? Ninjaediator (talk) 15:52, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

S S M - Request for page restoration

Hi Ninjaeditor! Could you please let me know which parts of the article are an issue? I've edited it and added references, links which do prove notability. Please let me know so this page can be restored at the earliest in the best way possible! Thanks! Parisgirl89 (talk) 11:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC) Parisgirl89[reply]

What is your connection with the subject of the article? Ninjaediator (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I own a marketing communications agency and he is one of our clients. Parisgirl89 (talk) 11:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Parisgirl89[reply]

Could you please tell me the name of your marketing agency and how would your client get benefited from a Wikipedia page? Ninjaediator (talk) 11:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an email ID I can send these details to please? Parisgirl89 (talk) 11:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Parisgirl89[reply]

Sure, please email to: ninjaediator@gmail.com. Ninjaediator (talk) 11:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! I've written to you - please do check and let me know! Parisgirl89 (talk) 11:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was no fruitful content in the email? Ninjaediator (talk) 11:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What else would you require as content? I shared the details requested and also asked if you could help with how to go about editing the page to match wikipedia standards. Parisgirl89 (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need your agency's name, and how would your client benefit from a Wikipedia page? Ninjaediator (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New agency, barely a month old. Still setting up all the basics and this is the first assignment. Does it require to be called out in the talk page of the article that it is being edited by the team and requires your assistance to edit it appropriately to match wikipedia standards? I can do that. Parisgirl89 (talk) 11:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great! You are expert with Wikipedia editing. What are your other accounts please? Ninjaediator (talk) 12:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Expert? I read up all the articles available here on how to publish articles and what possible mistakes are being made. Other accounts?Parisgirl89 (talk) 12:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not answered to my questions! Ninjaediator (talk) 12:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1. Google helps with responses to a lot of questions you raised - I don't have to be a 'sock of an experienced editor'. 2. I mentioned my agency name and the benefit in the email shared. Along with details. 3. I've also been asking you to help me understand how I can do this better so I don't have to keep going back to google to look for help - again refer to point 1. If I could do this on my own, I wouldn't be writing to you here, right? Parisgirl89 (talk) 12:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You only wrote to me because I stopped you moving the un-reviewed draft to main-space. You already wrote a pretty good well formatted article which has been submitted to AFC so wait for the reviewer to review it. Ninjaediator (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! If that's the case, I'm okay to wait for the reviewer's response. It would help if you didn't call me a sock though. I had to go through three articles to understand what that even meant. But thanks for all the help! Have a great week ahead!Parisgirl89 (talk) 12:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Bullaiytro (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. – bradv🍁 17:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am indeed a sockpuppet but not Bullaiytro, it should be Meme Lord 519. Anyway this doesn't matter anymore. Ninjaediator (talk) 18:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C: the answers to your questions about me is here[1]. You are an admin so you can check the deleted content of Fastily. Bye! Ninjaediator (talk) 18:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: I only have access to my talk page so I am sorry, I won't be able to help you anymore. Good luck! Ninjaediator (talk) 20:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: I have something very crucial to share with you. Kindly mail me via Wikipedia so I know it is you. Ninjaediator (talk) 17:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please email the details to info-en@wikimedia.org. GSS ^💬 17:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS:, I did but no response? Ninjaediator (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tried, but can't find your email. GSS ^💬 11:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bradv:, @DeltaQuad: I accept I was a paid editor and has done socking. But I have left those behind and can help with identifying more paid-for-spam. Considering my contributions, am I eligible for parole? Ninjaediator (talk) 10:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Parole after 2 days? The standard offer is six months. – bradv🍁 23:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bradv: Actually a lot of spamming is still going on that I can identify and bring to your notice. I have already identified a lot of spams masquerading as articles so considering these efforts if the period can be shortened from six months then I will be very grateful. Ninjaediator (talk) 12:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ninjaediator, it seems you don’t understand what bradv is trying to tell you, even if you are a professional at identifying spam articles created by undisclosed paid editors, because you yourself have been confirmed to be a sockpuppet/engaged in sockpuppetry by technical evidence & your own self confession, the earliest possible time you may be unblocked would be in November per our standard offer/status quo/modus operandi in this collaborative project & furthermore your bludgeon isn’t going to help matters either.Celestina007 (talk) 21:09, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007: Are you kidding me? I just requested an admin if the timeframe can be shortened because WP:STANDARDOFFER states "The standard offer is not necessarily binding". Don't know what suddenly made you poke your nose into it. It seems you do not understand the policies well and I am not obligated to make you understand so please refrain from accusing me of WP:BLUDGEON. Ninjaediator (talk) 11:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Barkeep49: with due respect, your student Celestina007 has some difficulty understanding policy and WP:EGO. Please take care. Ninjaediator (talk) 14:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ninjaediator, I’m sorry, how or why I even bothered to take a blocked sockpuppet serious in the first place is something I myself cannot fathom now. Also if you intend to delete comments I made you may as well delete all my entries & not delete some & leave some that’s borderline inane in my opinion & furthermore how are you a blocked sockpuppet & not appealing for an unblock via your original account? Like I said earlier I really do hope your sharp mouth gets you “eligible for parole” in just three days of being blocked & what’s with pinging barkeep49? Once more, I’m sorry for ever bothering to take a sockpuppet serious I’d be damned if I ever reply any of your asinine comments ever again. Celestina007 (talk) 15:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

@MER-C: You said this nomination had some merit and any experienced editor can see the subject fails WP:NPOL however it was speedily closed within 48 hours from my nomination by a non-admin? Ninjaediator (talk) 12:24, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearcat: because of your detail rationale on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutan Rathore, could you please check Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thakur_Shivam_Singh which was created by the same editor but closed by another non-admin editor who has less than 150 edit counts? Ninjaediator (talk) 12:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duilio Barnabè

Hello Ninjaediator. I am creating a new Duilio Barnabè article to replace one I had contributed to before it was moved to Draft space, apparently because the creator of the stub was a paid editor. Please advise on the next step. Ewulp (talk) 01:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]