User talk:Ninj

Apologies

-- Apologies for the warning + reverting your edit with out much thought. I should have checked the talk page. My apologies.--Ssault 00:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Hopefully it will stay deleted now.

Could we remove the quality warning, and re-classify this article as a stub?

Ninj 11:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--I added the stub notice at the end of it, but maybe the cleanup tag should stay for now. --Ssault 12:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--If you say so. But it seems to me that what it needs is no longer cleanup but something else. I'm going to have a go at adding some stuff, as and when I've got time. --Ninj 16:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---Perhaps cleanup isn't the right term, but more just rebuilding the article. Sort of work through as a typical wikipedia article with a few basic categories (such as history, uses, etc etc). I'll help out where I can, but I'm not exactly an expert on this particular section of knowledge. --Ssault 17:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---I updated the tags, you can see them at the top of the page. I think those suit best, but change them if you feel otherwise. --Ssault 18:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]