User talk:Nimrod1234

Welcome!

Hello, Nimrod1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!--989 RVD 21:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Samus Aran

Good work on fixing up that vandilism that person added (Zamus Aran) Feel free to reply on my talk page if you like . Cocopopz2005

Zero Suit Bio

That guy is going to put it back. You need to explain to him why it doesn't belong in the article...he's a rather persistant fellow. -Sukecchi 19:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About your deletion of the warrock knowleage base link

If you go to this link http://forum.warrock.net/viewtopic.php?t=10508 you can see that K2 Network has made it offical. That is why I added it to the Warrock Wiki. [[[User:Planb11]|21:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)]

Pivot! Animation

I agree, your animation was 100% better!

RE: Pivot

Really, it was not your animation? If it was not your's who's was it! (Also if it is yours don't be afraid to admit it, That one was 100% Pure Pwnage!)

Cyanide & Happiness (new article)

I see now that TexasDex's article is inaccurate. I confess that I'm not very good at writing articles from scratch. I would appreciate it if you could put something together. I will reference it if it comes down to me to put Cyanide back on deletion review (for the third time!). bernlin2000 ∞ 16:07, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've made a lot of changes to the new article, and I'm glad for it. However you have also added a lot of biased material, without any sources, in a non-encyclopedic tone, as well as minor formatting problems. I am attempting to fix the problems; meanwhile in the future please try to follow WP:NPOV and WP:STYLE. Thank you. --TexasDex 22:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Cape0002.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cape0002.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Cape0002.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cape0002.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Thanks for reverting vandalism, but edit summaries such as this are not appropriate. Please be reasonably civil, even to the spammers. — Scientizzle 18:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Portrait.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]