User talk:Nimazandyf

This is Nimazandyf's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yaftabadi Family (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying our simplest standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yaftabadi Family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Morteza Yaftabadi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Morteza Yaftabadi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zand dynasty descendents (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zand dynasty descendents and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades^Godric 06:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nimazandyf, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winged Blades^Godric 06:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Zand dynasty descendents concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Zand dynasty descendents, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zand dynasty descendents

Hello, Nimazandyf. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zand dynasty descendents".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kailanmapper (talk) 17:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you?! you are a historian?! i am expert in Zand History you can see my page in instagram @Zand_history

you can not share those incorrect maps! ok? i wont let you Nimazandyf (talk) 17:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you published any scholarly publications peer-reviewed and widely known throughout the academic world? Kailanmapper (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

in summary change messages you couldn't answer to my question, you didnt know the first and original source of Zand history, and now you are questioning me?! whenever you prove your map correctly by first source, we can talk with each other! Nimazandyf (talk) 18:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information from your source is disputed by reliable secondary sources. Although Golshan-i Murad and Mojmal o Tawarikh are well known primary sources containing information on the Zand dynasty, we know have secondary sources that contain information from both of these sources and more. I will ask you again to support your information from reliable sources. Kailanmapper (talk) 19:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask you again to support your information from reliable sources! Yo dont know whats the different between first and secondary source! although there are lots of secondary source that prove my words but the first sources i mentioned are more importantly that i am sure you haven't read them. so i will no let you to put that incorrect map. Nimazandyf (talk) 10:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Golshan Morad and Majmol o Tawarikh are clearly not secondary sources, they are contemporary/near contemporary sources and are thus primary/first sources. If there are lots of secondary sources that prove your words why don't you show them to me? Kailanmapper (talk) 12:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You put this wrong map and all of the idiots defend you!

I will change and remove your map!

you couldn't answer my question and you couldn't defend your fake map Nimazandyf (talk) 22:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

contemporary/near contemporary sources? :))) how dare you to create maps with this low level information?! Nimazandyf (talk) 22:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue as you did at Zand Dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. Please use article's talk page for discussion to reach consensus. - MehmoodS (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your edit is unacceptable. i only put the right and original map. i wont let youto put this wrong map. Nimazandyf (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They try to put a new map which is completely wrong! and they couldn't answer my question and don't know what is first level resource! so i want you to keep the wikipedia from these illiterate persons! I put this map : Map_of_the_Zand_dynasty.png and this is used in many pages and is true. under this map there is details and the name of resources Nimazandyf (talk) 08:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You put my name in the reported list? why? you should mention this man: Kailanmapper ! not me

i didnt do anything against the law. and only put the main Zand Dynasty map. Ok? Nimazandyf (talk) 21:24, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:49, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lil-unique1. I noticed that you recently removed content from WP:ANI without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to WP:ANI, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please do not remove reports against you. You do have the right to respond but do not remove. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why You are doing this immoral behavior?!the first user who broke the law was Kailanmapper! i only put the real map of zand dynasty. Nimazandyf (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were reverted and asked to not remove reports on the administrator's noticeboard about incidents. It is not immoral. The administrator who blocked you did so because you are engaged in an edit war. Even if you are right, we do not engage in reverting edits more 3 times or more within 24 hours. This is called the 3 revert rule. Anyone breaking this rule, regardless of how correct the information is will be blocked. You should read Bold Edit, Revert, Discuss. If you have made an edit which has been undone, you should start a discussion on the relevant talk page and wait until you have a agreement for the edits you wish to make. These are the rules we all abide to. If you can't abide by these rules then you will not be allowed to edit on wikipedia. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_the_Zand_dynasty.png

this is what i put! explain why you changed this map?! Nimazandyf (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nimazandy, Wikipedia has very strict rules around edit warring. While we encourage people to be bold and make edits, once another editor reverts you, you are expected to discuss with them on a talk age (usually the article's talkpage, in this case Talk:Zand dynasty. If you don't follow this rule, you will lose your editing privileges. Please read through our edit-warring policy, and when your block expires in 24 hours, raise your suggestions regarding article content at the appropriate talk page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the main map of zand dynasty was Map_of_the_Zand_dynasty.png for many years! so your IQ is very low if you think this new map is true! whenever the owner of the map could prove you his unreal map, you could say anything to me, but at this moment you dont have any knowledge about it so: you do not have any permit to do block me! Im going to object to the manager of wikipedia about this cruelty way.. soon. Nimazandyf (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Very unwise to make the exact same edit after your block ended.[1] - LouisAragon (talk) 23:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:53, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the main map of zand dynasty was Map_of_the_Zand_dynasty.png for many years! so your IQ is very low if you think this new map is true! whenever the owner of the map could prove you his unreal map, you could say anything to me, but at this moment you dont have any knowledge about it so: you do not have any permit to do block me! Im going to object to the manager of wikipedia about this cruelty way.. soon. Nimazandyf (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

It's pretty clear you're not interested in collaborating with other users to build a project, only in pushing what you want the edits to be and continually edit warring and acting in a non-collaborative fashion. You've been warned, re-warned and final warned. Canterbury Tail talk 15:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 15:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the main map of zand dynasty was Map_of_the_Zand_dynasty.png for many years! so your IQ is very low if you think this new map is true! whenever the owner of the map could prove you his unreal map, you could say anything to me, but at this moment you dont have any knowledge about it so: you do not have any permit to do block me! Im going to object to the manager of wikipedia about this cruelty way.. soon. Nimazandyf (talk) 17:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nimazandyf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the main map of zand dynasty was Map_of_the_Zand_dynasty.png for many years! so your IQ is very low if you think this new map is true! whenever the owner of the map could prove you his unreal map, you could say anything to me, but at this moment you dont have any knowledge about it so: you do not have any permit to do block me! Im going to object to the manager of wikipedia about this cruelty way.. soon. Nimazandyf (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:GAB explains how to craft an unblock request. We won't consider requests like this. Yamla (talk) 17:53, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nimazandyf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The map of Zand dynasty in Zand dynasty page is not true, some month ago, some unknown persons put this wrong map. If you let me I will prove that this map is not equal with historical documents. I did it but they blocked me. please consider justice in your website Nimazandyf (talk) 16:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In several years here you seem to have had a single focus on a particular article and have edited it disruptively(including edit warring) that entire time. There's no way you are going to be unblocked to continue to edit in that topic area. If that is your only interest here, this is the end of the road for your Wikipedia career. If you agree to a topic ban from that article and related matters(like images/maps) and want to edit about something else, tell us what. 331dot (talk) 21:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

several years?! I only was objecting during 1 month about that article! and i focus on this article because Im an expert in 18th history of Iran! and that map is not true! there is clear that they intentionally put that wrong map to show Zand Dynasty smaller than its reality. they are pro-qajar activist on wikipedia..Nimazandyf (talk) 2:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nimazandyf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im an expert in 18th history of Iran, this is why i was focused in Zand Dynasty page, because that map is wrong, I only focused on that page just after 2 month. before that i had engaged with another articles. The real map of Zand dynasty was another map for several years! I just objected to new wrong map Nimazandyf (talk) 22:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

You're a little calmer here; I accept that, so I will not be revoking your talk page access as a third request in the vein of your previous ones might have provoked me to do. But you still display the same focus on the same issue that has troubled the other reviewing admins, and I'm not convinced you won't go right back to that like the moth to the proverbial flame. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.