User talk:Nikols70

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ciklum (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ciklum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ciklum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ciklum. Thanks! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 17:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ciklum (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ciklum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nikols70, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sulfurboy, My article (Draft:Ciklum) was declined. Please advise me what exactly not suitable with references in that article? Article has references from trusted resources like Bloomberg. Forbes.ua, Computerweekly, Kyivpost etc. Nikols70 (talk) 12:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ciklum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ciklum. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 18:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. If you are a paid editor, I remind you of our our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure DGG ( talk ) 21:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ciklum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ciklum. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ciklum has been accepted

Ciklum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

I made a deletion of some material praising the Breadbasket foundation that really belongs elsewhere. Also a few similar changes.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 20:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]