User talk:Nikolaneberemed

Welcome!

Hello, Nikolaneberemed, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

White privilege

Nikolaneberemed I note that you have previously commented on the White Privilege page. There are ongoing discussions on this page which are connected to previous issues you have raised. You may find it interesting to review and contribute to this ongoing debate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:White_privilege#Wikipedia_-_what_the_hell_is_going_on_? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keith Johnston (talk • contribs) 10:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ian.thomson (talk) 16:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there are similar discretionary sanctions in place for:

You should review WP:RSP, which details the community's consensus regarding a variety of sources. Also, be aware that Wikipedia is not a general discussion forum, so talk page posts that are not focused on improving the article within the site's policies and guidelines are inappropriate. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You actually need the appropriate alerts:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:46, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any posts being removed from the talk page

See [1] Doug Weller talk 17:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 00:32, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Progressive stack. Toddst1 (talk) 22:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators noticeboard discussion notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --—Paleo Neonate – 22:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BLP/TPG vios maybe GAMING DS too

I removed this comment of yours

--DiAngelo is definitely not a racist--
She is definitely not racist. She just thinks like a collectivist and believes one race is inherently bad. That's not racist at all. She's not a racist. Just felt the need to point this out because it's not in the article, which is not biased at all. The article is great. Nikolaneberemed (talk) 09:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

from the talk page in the link above. As written its a BLP vio (not neutral, not verifiable) and you seem to be WP:GAMING the system (general discussions, POV advocacy) by repeating past offenses the month after your prior DS alerts expire. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:White privilege. Binksternet (talk) 22:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 14:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]