User talk:Niko the Biko

August 2020

Hello, I'm Kinetic37. I noticed that you recently removed content from UEFA Europa Conference League without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. kinetic37_talk 19:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because why not? Niko the Biko (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RossButsy. I noticed that you recently added content to Ronald Koeman without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content you added has been deleted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RossButsytalk 21:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC) RossButsy (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? I explained why I did it. Stop being an idiot. Niko the Biko (talk) 20:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RossButsy (talk) 21:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC) RossButsy (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fair enough, I won't attack you. But why are you ignoring my point??? Is it that I'm right and you're shocked???? Or is it because you're a bot??? Niko the Biko (talk) 21:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1.Youre not right, you said you explained the edits you made when you didn’t. You treated an actual page as a learning tool. 2. The only bots on Wikipedia are the ones with “Bot” in their name kid. RossButsy (talk) 23:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you out of your mind? Or do you have some levels of delusion? Check my corrections, I explained what I was doing. Bad luck Ross, but you're wrong. Niko the Biko (talk) 12:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Per #Infobox timestamps. RossButsy (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And did I ask? No. Block me if u want I don't even use wiki Niko the Biko (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Have a nice trip then 😉 RossButsy (talk) 12:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted) Ross Niko the Biko (talk) 21:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hans-Dieter Flick. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AtomsRavelAz talk 00:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted) and stop being so twattish Niko the Biko (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Niko the Biko: twattish: (comparative more twattish, superlative most twattish) (slang, derogatory) Characteristic of a twat; obnoxious., Obnoxious: extremely unpleasant..

Isn't that exactly what you are doing? being a nuisance and "twattish" with your disruptive editing and your slanderous replies. Perhaps It'd be a good idea to look yourself in the mirror and stop being a hypocrite before attempting to insult people.

I won't get mad at you, for all I know you are maybe just an immature 12-year-old trying to be edgy. One day you'll realize the severity of what you said and look back at it with regret. Suicide is not something to be joked with, suicide is something incredibly serious that affects the lives of countless people, I would never wish something like that on you or anyone, regardless of how "twattish" you are.

I'm not your dad, I can't tell you what to do and what not to do, you are the only person in control of your actions, but you need to understand that everything in life has consequences, and that you'll have to deal with them for the rest of your life.

Perhaps you should re-evaluate what it is you are doing with your free time, because insulting strangers over the internet and telling them to kill themselves is to say the least very unbecoming.

Best regards, AtomsRavelAz talk 20:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, seeing as this particular redacted incivility is your go-to when others disagree with you, I've changed the block to indefinite. This is absolutely not how one is expected to interact with others on a collaborative project.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:51, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:50, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

UTRS appeal #36046 has been declined as not addressing the reason for the block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:50, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]