User talk:NiklasGo

May 2018

Can you please state which original account you are referring to? I started the article from the NiklasGo account. Thank you! NiklasGo (talk) 06:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC) NiklasGo (talk) 06:07, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Maximalconcepts, which was blocked for promotional editing for creating an article about the same subject(the company itself). 331dot (talk) 07:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NiklasGo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: The block is no longer necessary, because I understood why I have been blocked, I will thus not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead NiklasGo (talk) 05:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is blocked as a sock puppet, meaning that you need to request to be unblocked from your original account. Your explanation is also inadequate; instead of just stating that you understand, you need to explain in your own words what you did wrong, what steps you will take to ensure it does not happen again, and what useful contributions you intend to make if unblocked. Please do so from your original account. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:12, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NiklasGo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here NiklasGo (talk) 03:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 04:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. clpo13_(talk) 05:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]