User talk:Nikicia/sandbox
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Joselv83 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/9/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Nikicia |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/9/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 05/9/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good Length. |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | N/A |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
| Wikiformatting | Good Formatting. |
| Grammar & composition | Good grammar. |
| Other comments | Stress is a great topic, see if you can add some bullets, good job! |
Joselv83 (talk) 04:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: DJames5
Date of review- 5/6/13
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Nikicia
URL of editor’s Userpage- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/6/13
Date review submitted to instructor- 5/6/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)- Good
Image (needed/appropriate)- n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)- Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)- Yes
Wikiformatting- could have added bullet points or numbers for more points
Grammar & composition- Good
Other comments- none
DJames5 (talk) 16:48, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Trinirebel (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Date of review 05/06/2013
Name of editor: Nikicia URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/06/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 05/06/2013 Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate length of edit
Image (needed/appropriate) None applicable for this edit
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information provided directly from text the text book
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate information provided
Wikiformatting Exemplary formatting
Grammar & composition Grammar and spelling were error free
Other comments Exemplary edit. Trinirebel (talk) 23:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Ramnel Cortorreal User:CRamel16 Date of review 05/06/2013
Name of editor: Nikicia URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/06/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 05/06/2013 Length of edit (too long/too short) Meets Length Requirement
Image (needed/appropriate) Not necessary for the edit
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information provided
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate information provided
Wikiformatting Exemplary formatting
Grammar & composition No Grammatical errors found
Other comments Good edit. CRamel16 (talk) 23:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]Name of student reviewer- F.Moshammad
Date of review 5/10/2013
Name of editor-Nikicia.
URL of editor’s Userpage - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/10/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/10/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)-Not too long or too short
Image (needed/appropriate)- Image is not needed but an image can improve the quality of the edit.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)-The information is accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed- N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)- N/A
Wikiformatting- The formatting looks good.
Grammar & composition- Proper construction of edit
Other comments - Good Job!
F.Moshammad (talk) 04:36, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
[edit]| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:VIMMYSEAJATAN |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/10/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Nikicia |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/10/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 05/10/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good! Try to add bullets, such as relaxation, biofeedback, and cognitive restructuring, can be put into bullet formatting |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | N/A |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
| Wikiformatting | needs better Formatting. |
| Grammar & composition | Good grammar. |
| Other comments | Stress is a great topic, good job!
However, are you just using the textbook as a reference for this edit? I saw another book below! Keep in mind that the class textbook is the only book we using as a reference to do textbook base edits! (this pre peer review is for Stress Management) |
VIMMYSEAJATAN 142.105.19.140 (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Vimmy (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)