User talk:Nikhilc83

February 2017

Hello, I'm FriyMan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. FriyMan ^talk 14:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Nikhilc83, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! FriyMan ^talk 07:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Raghunath Ballal Atre

Hello, Nikhilc83. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raghunath Ballal Atre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raghunath Ballal Atre

Hello, Nikhilc83. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Raghunath Ballal Atre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Savarkar

Hello, and thanks for your interest in editing the article about Savarkar. For such a high-profile article, an old biography is likely not to be an ideal source. Also, large changes to the article, such as you have made, require WP:CONSENSUS. Please discuss your changes on the talk page before continuing to make them. Best, Vanamonde (Talk) 20:02, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93 the Correct Biography is important. Old or New does not matter. If Dr Dhananjay Keer is a Padmashree Award Winner then he is a writer of repute. moreover he wrote Savarkar's Official biography. Moreover I am giving you the reference of who called Savarkar as Veer for the first time which was author Sadashiv Rajaram Ranade then why do you deny it? Ranade's biography on Savarkar was endorsed by prominent personality Shri N.C Kelkar who wrote the preface of the book.

Veer Savarkar lived from 1883 to 1966 hence contemporary writers of his era who met him are also relevant. Nikhilc83 (talk) 20:07, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "official" biography has no more status on Wikipedia; indeed, depending on what "official" means in this case, it's not unlikely it's a less reliable source, as it may not be independent of its subject. Regardless, now that you have been reverted, this is something you need to discuss on the article's talk page. The Ranade issue is more straightforward; his writing cannot verify that he used the term "Veer" for the first time, only that he used it. A different source is needed for the claim you added. Please read WP:OR and WP:RS carefully before further editing this article. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:14, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93 the original reference of Savarkar using the epithet Veer for himself is unfounded as the epithet was given by Sadashiv Rajaram Ranade for the first time to him. Nikhilc83 (talk) 20:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Secondly sources from Padmashree awardee Dr Dhananjay Keer's Savarkar's biography must be included given his accolades. Dr Keer is a Padmashree award winner. which of the other sources quoted on the page are Padmashree awardees? Nikhilc83 (talk) 20:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article at no point said he used it for himself. You have once again added content not supported by the source, and added dreadfully formatted content. Please read WP:NOR and WP:CITEHOW and WP:CONSENSUS; continuing to force through your version is likely to lead to your being blocked. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93 Sir, on what grounds will I be blocked. I am not forcing through my own version. i am giving you the best sources on the topic like Padmashree Award Winner like Dr Dhananjay Keer's books. Is it wrong to provide certified sources of information? Nikhilc83 (talk) 20:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will be blocked if you persist in not formatting your content, and by engaging in original research, which you have done again [1] after I twice told you what the problem was. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93 i am not a computer programmer myself so am not good at coding. But yes, I am very well informed and have the best and most authentic sources to refer. if you have an email id i can email you my edits, links to archives and valid screenshots from books I quote. i think that will help you organize details instead of me trying edits and providing you unformatted information. Please share me your email id. Nikhilc83 (talk) 20:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be doing that. You are obligated to format your additions correctly. I have twice given you a link to a page explaining how to format your citations. I do so now for a third time: WP:CITEHOW. I have also told you twice that using Ranade's book to claim Ranade gave Savarkar his title is prohibited original research. I'm getting a little tired of repeating myself, so I'm going to step away from this conversation, but if you haven't a) formatted your changes correctly, b) used a better source in place of Ranade, and c) obtained consensus for your use of Keer, you can expect your content to be removed again; and if you continue to reinstate it, you are likely to face sanctions. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:46, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93 ok, i will refer to the link of WP:CITEHOW shared by you and make edits as per your advice. Authentic details from the Veer Savarkar biography written by Padmashree awardee Dr Dhananjay Keer will be drafted in accordance with your policies of WP:CITEHOW. In reference to Ranade's source will rephrase the edit in acceptable terms as per your advice. Nikhilc83 (talk) 20:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trust this is acceptable Nikhilc83 (talk) 20:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions to Keer still require consensus, and as I have challenged them, you are obliged to obtain that consensus via talk page discussion. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:06, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93 Dr Keer is a Padmashree award winner. Sir, on what basis are his views challenged considering that he holds one of the highest awards of India? Nikhilc83 (talk) 02:56, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:DUE and WP:RS. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary

Thanks for your contributions, Please go through WP:PLOTSUM for writing brief plot summaries. I have condensed your earlier contributions. --TheMandarin (talk) 17:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]