User talk:Nikelaughzyonhel Azmhyedlaugkh Bellaughzryael

Welcome!

Hello, Nikelaughzyonhel Azmhyedlaugkh Bellaughzryael, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 21:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of site policies and guidelines

"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
It is recommended that you do not add anything relating to yourself to article space, and it is expressly forbidden to use Wikipedia to promote anything about yourself. Personal websites are generally not allowed in external links.
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.
Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited. If a source makes a small claim and presents two larger counter claims, the material it supports should present one claim and two counter claims instead of presenting the one claim as extremely large while excluding or downplaying the counter claims.
We do not give equal validity to topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia. For example, our article on Earth does not pretend it is flat, hollow, and/or the center of the universe.

Ian.thomson (talk) 21:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why your edit was removed

It did not cite any reliable sources. Wikipedia only paraphrases and summarizes mainstream academic and journalistic sources, we do not host original research. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My Discussion About My Edit

I myself am original source. I do not need to cite myself, author and original theoretician? Especially when the logics I discuss are self-apparent immanences to available forms?--Similarly, one does not need to cite references when deriving the Pythagorean formulas from triangles if one's math and rigor are right. To see the discussed article edit, on "Azrael", see my primary user page <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikelaughzyonhel_Azmhyedlaugkh_Bellaughzryael">here</a>.

Read WP:Identifying reliable sources. You are not named there. User pages are not accepted as sources. Citing yourself as an "original source" is original research. For the third time, we do not accept original research.

It's really simple: if something is not already explicitly stated in a mainstream academic or journalistic source, it does not belong on Wikipedia. If something does not have a source, it does not belong in an article. Our article on the Sky has four citations for the statement that the sky is blue. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Nikelaughzyonhel Azmhyedlaugkh Bellaughzryael, exceeds 40 characters.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (talk) 01:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

my response (Nike...): I find your policy and execution dishonorable and discommending, wrongfully, against the grain of my apparent virtue/glory. You have failed to provide quality services free of evil as is reasonable.— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

... You're trolling, right? Ian.thomson (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]